by police officers at the hospital and that they had photographed the scene.

    Finally, the Government maintained that the applicant's language had clearly exceeded the limits of free expression and that there were no reasonable grounds for the applicant to believe

The customs department maintained that they had reasonable grounds to suspect that there were documents, in electronic or other form, on the applicants’ premises which, on the basis of reasonable suspicion

showing that they were applying the Court’s principles and case-law in this area ( The Queen (on application of Duncan MacNeil) v.

requirement” and held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.

The prosecution case was that there had been a conspiracy to deceive HM Customs and Excise into believing that the consignment would be shipped to other European countries and the duty would be paid in

According to the medical statement, there were reasons to believe that the applicant’s work had caused his problems.

Although the Minister accepted that there was family life between the third applicant and each of his parents and his siblings, and that there were objective obstacles to the exercise of family life between

They alleged, in particular, that the prohibition violated their right to freedom of religion under Article 4 of the Basic Law. They denied that they advocated the use of violence. 9.

It therefore found unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.

of the administrative detention of foreigners, it now considered that the action for a full remedy ( tam yargı davası ) before administrative courts could in theory provide effective redress in that regard

  The jury may have felt that they were not obscene or they may have felt that they were obscene but he had the statutory defence."   38.

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible

They pointed out that, under Article 28 of the Constitution, the provisions of international treaties took precedence over domestic-law provisions once they had been ratified by the legislature, and that

In so far as relevant, the Court of Appeal noted that the evidence provided by the Italian authorities was more than sufficient to prove that the sum of EUR   1,946,200 (the laundering of which was

    The Court's assessment (a)     General principles The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention does not apply to proceedings instituted against third parties unless the

that he is a foreigner.

The Government maintained that such remedies were effective both in theory and in practice.

her complaints on the sole ground that they were out of time. 34.