AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC001920407
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC003948704
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC002104103
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC000182103
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC004233602
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC005194099
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC005379700
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3126122-3480922
18 mai 2010
18 mai 2010
Ms Belka and Ms Czekień were refused payments under the compensation scheme for failure to meet the eligibility criteria and, in Ms Belka’s case, for insufficient evidence confirming
Source officielleChambre Sociale-Section 3
63465945c024d1adffef756e
10 octobre 2022
10 octobre 2022
application des dispositions de l'article 945-1 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 21 Juin 2022, en audience publique, les parties ne s'y étant pas opposées, devant Madame Clarisse SCHIRER
Source officielleChambre Sociale-Section 3
63465947c024d1adffef757c
10 octobre 2022
10 octobre 2022
Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Madame Clarisse SCHIRER, Présidente de Chambre Mme Carole PAUTREL, Conseillère Mme Anne FABERT, Conseillère
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129DEC001429102
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129DEC001981602
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC006118500
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0115DEC006241500
15 janvier 2008
15 janvier 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129DEC004932899
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC007800701
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1679
18 février 2009
18 février 2009
It further held that, as those employers were not taxpayers in Latvia, there was no reason for her to be covered by the Latvian mandatory social-insurance scheme.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129DEC007351701
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC000007703
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC002540005
12 février 2008
12 février 2008
The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court’s decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v.
Source officiellePage 42 sur 462