On 21 March and 2 May 2011 the applicant made two additional payments of HRK 21,450 and HRK 15,225.75 respectively, thus paying the full amount of his debt.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.     The first applicant is the owner of an apartment in Turin, which he had let to G.G.

On 9 May 2001 the applicant claimed widows’ benefits. His claim was disallowed on 25 May 2001. The applicant appealed and his appeal was refused on 27 September 2001. 4.

A subsequent modification made on 28 March 2016 allowed people to leave their homes between 4.30   a.m. and 9.30 p.m. and another modification made on 5 June 2016 limited the curfew hours to between

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Uj v.

          During the 28 days period an application may be made under Section 28 (6) of the 1969 Act for an interim care order.

The submissions must be dismissed as having been made to a court that lacked jurisdiction to entertain them. ...

He was questioned about a specific allegation made by A that the applicant had touched her inappropriately on the morning of 3 May 2003 in the nurse’s room.

It appears that three months later S. wanted to marry the applicant, but she did not agree.

On 13 May 2002, CCC made an application to the court for authority to refuse contact between the children and parents. On 17 May 2002, Mrs B. was appointed guardian of the children.

The Public Prosecution Service may refuse to comply with a request to call a witness made by or on behalf of the accused.

The second applicant made further representations on 27 April 2009, which were rejected as not amounting to a fresh asylum claim on 1 May 2009.

to the police on 22 May, 24 May and 21 June 2002.

    On 11 May 2005 the Administrative Court refused another request by the Minister for an extension of the time-limit and assumed jurisdiction.

It concluded that the applicant’s complaints, made in two letters of 14   May 2014 and 9 July 2014 respectively, about being a victim of harassment by her superior had been false.

On 13 September 2001 the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of 24   May 2001.

The hearing will be held at 9 a.m. and the webcast will be made available on the Court’s website from 2.30 p.m. that day.

Over the course of those three days, I found out many things, and now I understand that this werewolf in uniform [referring to the applicant] runs a well-developed network for selling amphetamines.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 28   April   2000 and was rejected on 8 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.