During the entire period of his detention, until 12   May 2006, he was kept in three different cells: nos. 50, 52 and 56. On 10   November 2004 he was held for several hours in cell no. 50.

When he regained consciousness, he found himself lying outside the room with his head bleeding. 7.

According to the applicant, he was held in a metal cage during the court hearings of 13, 22 and 25   January 2016.

He was a high-ranking official during the communist era. At the time of the events, he neither held a public office nor was a candidate for such an office. A.

The applicant’s wife stated that she had provided blank paper to the applicant who had told her that he was writing a book in detention, that subsequently he had told her that the manuscript had been taken

Consequently, no award is made under this head.

One of these three, Mustafa Engin, reported when he was released that Ahmet Çakıcı had been beaten, a rib being broken and his head split open.

    The first hearing was held on 5 November 1991. The applicant did not attend the hearings held between 16 June 1992 and 17 November 1998.

    On 16 December 1993 the District Court held a hearing at which the applicant provided further particulars of her action in that she was seeking a ruling declaring that she had the right to

    On 27 April 1993 the court held a hearing. B.     Facts after 1 May 1993 9.     On 17 March 1994 the court held a hearing. 10.

Italy 05/12/2022 BOMODI S.R.L. 2021 Foggia Italian Cristiano STASI Foggia 25/11/2022 Head of Revenue Police in Foggia Check the applicant company’s compliance with its tax obligations from 01/01/2022 to

He argued that the CEC could not lawfully end the country-wide election without first having held an election in the Khulo and Kobuleti districts.

The interrogators wanted the detainee to realise that he had a “pathway” whereby, if he provided even a little information, he could start to find a way out of captivity.

    At a hearing held on 14 June 2017 the second applicant interrupted the deputy head of the OSCOC without permission.

On 9 March 1999 he presented his report to the court which, on 12 July 1999, held a hearing.

According to his written statement, filed with the head of the National Border Guard and, subsequently, with the Court, he informed the officers of the border guard that those two applicants wanted to

his head against the walls and kicking the bars, saying that he was going to complain about the police and get them into trouble.

Had the applicant intended to send the letter to the head of the Košice 20 post office as a particular individual, he would have had to indicate her first name and surname in the first line of the address

According to the information initially supplied by Mr Bushchenko this applicant was under Government control as he was held in SIZO no. 21 of Odessa.