He had also noted that he had strong political support.

of applicable requirements, that he had not had an enforceable right to compensation in that respect, that his telephone communications had been monitored unlawfully and arbitrarily, and that he had had

An expert opinion issued in the course of the civil proceedings had confirmed that the incidents in question had had an adverse impact on the applicant’s moral integrity and had left long-lasting effects

The applicant had thus been given an opportunity to have her examined which his counsel had unjustifiably missed.

However, they had to be taken as a whole, considering the effect they had had, and the applicant had failed to show the necessary restraint in the circumstances.

The police had concluded that there had been no rape on the grounds that V.K. had not resorted to violence or to the threat of violence and that the applicant had expressed her objection only after – but

The applicant organisation had not submitted any information which would indicate that at the relevant time it had had any particular experience in or that it had pursued activities related to constitutional

They had not accepted the new family relationship and had objected to it, even in the courts, where one of them had been successful.

speaker and had left Czechoslovakia in 1949.

In fact, his pre-trial detention had been brought to an end when he had been convicted by the first-instance court in March 2014; that conviction had been based wholly on the impugned charges.

there had been a violation of Article 3.

Firstly, the courts had found that he had sent the picket notice belatedly; secondly, that he had obstructed passage to the court building; and thirdly, that the contents of the materials he had disseminated

They had to be understood within the specific context in which they had been made.

According to that calculation, the applicant had had personal space that had varied in area between 4.92 sq. m and 5.4 sq. m. 10.

The reports of 28 May had then attested to bruising on both the applicant’s arms. In the report of 29 May only scarring from a blade had been recorded; the bruising had disappeared.

It had alleged specific conduct on her part (signing illegal contracts and accepting bribes), and the applicants’ statements had given readers the impression that the person in question had behaved in

39 had been applied.

She had stated that they had expected a child together and that they had planned to rent a house together; he had also taken care of her three children and had a good relationship with them.

Furthermore, when the dog handler and the dog had returned to the applicants’ house, he had been informed that the suspect, P.K., had already been arrested; thus, he had not had any further reason to continue