d'utilité publique ; Considérant que l'arrêté du 3 février 1972 a déclaré d'utilité publique les travaux d'élargissement d'un ouvrage d'art et de la plate-forme du chemin départemental n° 24 au lieudit "Le Guilly

(1,000 guilders). 16.

He must therefore be found guilty and punished accordingly.” 8 .

  The Court noted that it had considered the applicant's admission of guilt as a mitigating circumstance.

    He pleaded not guilty to the incriminated criminal conduct. 12.

The applicant agreed to admit the guilt. On 14 December 2004 the applicant was formally arrested on suspicion of having committed the murder.

They were all guilty of negligence in office and lack of decisiveness in enforcing the law. Both the staff and the leadership of the organisation had breached several domestic legal provisions.

The applicant appealed, reiterating his plea of not guilty.

practising in Istanbul; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings on account of the applicant’s conviction on the basis of a presumption of guilt

    In a judgment dated 9 February 2012 the Ștefan Vodă District Court found the applicant guilty of possession and sale of cannabis.

of the former accused without his having previously been proved guilty according to law.

The applicant denied the accusation, but officer V.J. insisted on the applicant’s guilt.

  The question of whether or not they were guilty of deliberate tax evasion had been decided by the trial court whose appreciation of the available evidence was not objectionable.

    The Chișinău Court of Appeal reversed the above judgment and found the applicant guilty as charged.

On 29 May 2017 the Yalutorovsk District Court in the Tyumen Region (the District Court) found the applicant’s guilty for violating Article 18.8 §   1 of the CAO.

6-2) of the Convention which reads as follows:         "Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed       innocent until proved guilty

Emile Z..., demeurant Bois Hervé Saint-Malo des 3 Fontaines à Guilliers (Morbihan), 4°) M. Eugène A..., demeurant Ricourtel à Ploermel (Morbihan), 5°) M.

The applicant had thus been found guilty on the basis of testimony which the court of first instance had found sufficiently unconvincing to justify an acquittal.

.) - 35863/10 Decision 8.2.2011 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Absence of requirement for jury to state reasons when delivering guilty verdict: inadmissible