CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-80818
20 avril 2007
with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay to each applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French
Page 42 sur 783
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49373
6 janvier 1994
Whereas on 18 February 1993 the President of the Commission informed the President of the Ministers' Deputies that the Commission had taken note of the observations of the French
ECLI:CEDH:001-51695
3 décembre 1999
, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 22 027 French
ECLI:CEDH:001-51984
22 avril 1998
on 17 September 1997, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the respondent Government was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 40 000 French
Avis
CADA:20161902
9 juin 2016
du conseil municipal visant à définir avec précision la nature et l'étendue des besoins à satisfaire ; 10) la délibération du conseil municipal visant à approuver l'acquisition par la commune de la friche
10ème - 9ème chambres réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000034751611
17 mai 2017
enregistrés le 8 mars et le 2 mai 2017 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés en application de l'article 23-5 de l'ordonnance n° 58-1067 du 7 novembre 1958, la Quadrature du Net, French
ECLI:CEDH:001-51944
12 novembre 1998
April 1998, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 2 000 French
ECLI:CEDH:001-52286
21 octobre 2002
1999, in accordance with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay as just satisfaction, within three months Mr Gérard Potier 87 000 French
4ème - 1ère chambres réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000039655849
13 décembre 2019
-Le demandeur d'une autorisation d'exploitation commerciale doit démontrer, dans l'analyse d'impact mentionnée au III, qu'aucune friche existante en centre-ville ne permet l'accueil du projet envisagé.
ECLI:CEDH:001-49425
11 septembre 1995
Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 7 500 French
ECLI:CEDH:001-56213
24 avril 2003
that the case originated in an application (No. 28213/95) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 29 March 1993 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr I.A., a French
ECLI:CEDH:001-51073
18 janvier 1999
June 1998, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French
ECLI:CEDH:001-51267
25 juin 1996
Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14287
13 février 2024
(iii) Alleged non-observance of the six-month time-limit – The trial court had carried out a fresh assessment of the criminal charge against the applicant reviving the process of determining that charge
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD004640415
16 mai 2019
of sleeping places, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, infestation of cell with
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119DEC003165217
19 janvier 2023
air, lack of fresh air 48172/17 24/06/2017 Sergey Artavaztovich MINOSYAN 1976 IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region 01/02/2013 to 23/01/2018 4 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 23
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD005398222
23 janvier 2025
air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, overcrowding 7,500 -
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD003713618
26 octobre 2023
linen, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2659940-2906542
10 mars 2009
the Convention, the Court awarded the applicant 3,429.34 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 2,000 for non-pecuniary damage. ( The judgment is available only in French
ECLI:CEDH:002-5108
14 novembre 2002
In November 2000, a fresh application for a pardon was rejected and the applicant received a letter from the USCA doctor describing the change in his health and stating that there was no possibility of