Meliha OKSAL     Erdoğan OKSAL     Kerime OKSAL     Nevin MAĞARACI     Hasan OKSAL     Vildan ÖZÖKSÜZ (OKSAL)     Erol

Türkiye 22/03/2019 Erol URAY 1975 Manisa Turkish Awarded 105. 18792/19 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 29/03/2019 Murat YILMAZ 1974 Samsun Turkish Awarded 106. 19083/19 Diker v.

Turkey 24/06/2020 Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 108 25638/20 Erol v.

Norway , no. 31283/04, §§   47 ‑ 49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19   April 2011; Vulakh and Others v.

Sweden (dec.), no. 48518/99, ECHR   2003-XI; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, § 37, 19 April 2011; and Allen , cited above, § 123): “...

Norway , no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v.

1968 Gaziantep   Asiye POLAT 02/02/1960 Gaziantep   Mustafa TÜRKMEN Tribunal de grande instance de Nizip E. 1999/4047 ; K.1999/3340 31/01/2000         8719/10 04/02/2010 Erol

document 14 October 1993   Upon request of the Şirnak Brigade Commander, Muhsin Taş, who had been captured at about 05.00 hours, was delivered by the Cizre security directorate to gendarme commander Erol

Turkey   21/06/2017 Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention 62 60948/17 Erol

  Jamaica , Views of 16 July 1996, communication no. 600/1994, Errol   Johnson v. Jamaica , Views of 22 March 1996, communication no.   588/1994; and Michael Wanza v.

; Azmi Gündoğan, the commander of Silopi district gendarmerie headquarters until 4 August 1993; Hüsam Durmuş, the commander of Silopi district gendarmerie headquarters between 17 July 1993 and 1995; Erol

    14270/10 15/02/2010 Erol NARLI 15/11/1978 Ankara   Gökhan ÇİÇEK On 31 July 2008 the applicant initiated compensation proceedings before the SMAC.

Turkey 08/08/2019 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 63 47671/19 Erol v.

Ağır Ceza Mahkemesi E:2008/538E, K:2009/72)     24598/09 20/04/2009 Recep KUŞ 21/10/1971 Malatya   Ahmet DİLEKÇİ 30/03/1964 Isparta   Erol KOZANOĞLU 01/01/1968 Ankara   Ali KORKMAZ

  Jamaica , Views of 16 July 1996, communication no. 600/1994, Errol   Johnson v. Jamaica , Views of 22 March 1996, communication no.   588/1994; and Michael Wanza v.

;         Feride KAYIPOGLULARI 12/12/1950 1950 Magusa                     Erol

and 23 November 1996 from the applicant, Bahattin Aktuğ (mayor of Güçlükonak district, Şĸrnak province), Azmi Gündoğan (commander of Silopi district gendarmerie, Şĸrnak province, until 4 August 1993), Erol

the judgments brought to the Court’s attention the Court observes that the difference the applicant complains of resides not in the factual situations examined by the domestic courts (see, conversely, Erol

Parliament, such as the applicant, had the power to initiate changes of the Entity constitutions, the applicant would clearly not be able to adopt any such amendments on his own (contrast Paşa and Erkan Erol