accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15 May 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

  Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, which in this instance called for overall assessment.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 May 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 31 July 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now called

criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be determined with reference to criteria laid down in Court's case-law and in the light of the circumstances of the case, which in this instance called

circumstances of a   substantial and compelling character to justify a departure from the principle that, where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be further called

xa0; Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed with reference to criteria laid down in Court's case-law and in light of circumstances of case, which in this instance called

Inadmissible : Where an applicant called in question a provision of legislation or a regulation as being contrary, as such, to the Convention, and the right invoked was among those guaranteed by the Latvian

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 29 January 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

alleged unlawfulness of the Higher Electoral Council’s ( Yüksek Seçim Kurulu ) decisions of non-authorisation for the organisation of three provincial congresses of a newly founded political party called

Reasonableness of the length of proceedings: to be assessed with reference to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law and in the light of the circumstances of the case, which in the cases under review called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 31 July 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now called

  Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, which in this instance called for overall assessment.

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

    Has the applicant undergone a so ‑ called Murray -assessment (named after Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, 26 April 2016) and, if not, why not?

  7     Has the applicant undergone a so ‑ called Murray -assessment (named after Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, 26 April 2016) and, if not, why not?

he requested to be released as there was no more reason to suspect that he would hinder the clarification of the matter and as all his co-accused had already been released and none of them had been called