on 6 August 2019, upon the respective submission from the Deputy Minister of Justice of Ukraine, criminal proceedings into the applicant’s complaints had been initiated for the “infliction of light bodily

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of proceedings for minor bodily harm and insult in public instituted on her private criminal complaint.

The forensic medical expert issued a report stating that the applicant suffered light bodily injuries.

investigator modified the charges against the perpetrators and qualified their actions as hooliganism, a gross and intentional violation of public order, committed in group and accompanied with infliction of bodily

ORDONNANCE DE REFERE N° Référés Cabinet 3 ORDONNANCE DU : 11 Octobre 2024 Président : Madame BENDELAC, Juge Greffier lors de l’audience : Madame SOULIER, Greffière Greffier lors du prononcé : Madame BONALI

judiciaire des entreprises ; Attendu qu'il appert de l'arrêt attaqué que Caliez a été président-directeur général de la société GEFIMO jusqu'au 14 janvier 1982, date à laquelle il a été remplacé par Bonald

préjudices qu'elle subit des suites d'une chute sur la voie publique dont elle expose avoir été victime, le 24 mars 2024, à proximité de l'esplanade Jean Claude Beton et de la grande roue de l'Escale Borély

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire complémentaire, enregistrés le 20 juin et le 21 septembre 2022, Mme C B épouse A, représentée par Me Boccara, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler

The first-instance court sentenced them to five years’ imprisonment for causing serious bodily harm, vandalism, and property damage.

The applicant complained under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention about the bodily search and the search conducted by the police in her home and that she had had no effective remedy to challenge these

That abuse had resulted in serious bodily injuries and a deterioration in his mental health.

On the same day a criminal investigation was initiated into the offences of hooliganism [1] and inflicting bodily injuries on the applicant. Subsequently, A., M.

    On 8 May 2014 a district court found J.K. guilty of inflicting serious bodily injuries which, owing to his negligence, had caused V.O.’s death.

  On 29 July 1993 the Bregenz District Court convicted the applicant of having caused bodily harm with intent and sentenced him to a fine of 40 daily rates of ATS 180 each.

    The public prosecutor, to whom the applicants’ complaint was apparently transferred by the Ministry, commissioned an expert report from an orthopaedist (G.A.) concerning the bodily injuries

The report went on to note that the expert had found no bodily injuries on the applicant.

He was also charged with assault occasioning minor bodily harm. The bill of indictment specified that the applicant was subject to the rules on recidivism.

His bodily functions had been permanently diminished by 30% because bone substance in his skull and the lachrymal sac had been removed by a doctor. He had not lost his ability to work. 6 .

Their intention was to find and inflict serious bodily injury on a Liam Coyle.

    On 19 September 2005 the applicant was convicted of the murder of three persons, wilful infliction of bodily harm and breach of inviolability of a dwelling by Krasnodar District Court in