Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189920
15 janvier 2019
15 janvier 2019
However, they were denied access to the files which have been classified as secret.
Source officiellecr
613726aacd58014677427892
3 octobre 2007
3 octobre 2007
titulaire d'un nom de domaine sur le web 4JS.com (pièce-4) ; que les contacts, administratif et technique, sont respectivement Patrice I... et Jean-Philippe J... chez Four j's Development Tools sis 1 rue de Berne
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC006333200
16 septembre 2004
16 septembre 2004
The hearing was not held as the case file had not been obtained and the applicant had not been brought to court.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2059028-2179320
11 juillet 2007
11 juillet 2007
On 29 March 2007 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, under Article 30 [1] of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC001980092
18 octobre 1995
18 octobre 1995
Finally, the Court declared inadmissible the applicant's complaint that he had not been officially represented by a lawyer, as this matter had not been the subject
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0904DEC002695395
4 septembre 1996
4 septembre 1996
After conducting an oral hearing, the Bern Court of Appeal (Appellationshof) gave its judgment on 19 May 1993.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1002DEC002635402
2 octobre 2003
2 octobre 2003
The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that he had been denied access to court to challenge the decisions of the authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC006015110
4 septembre 2012
4 septembre 2012
In this connection, considering that his rights had not been prejudiced, the court rejected the applicant’s claim for compensation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0417DEC003560297
17 avril 1997
17 avril 1997
Egloff, a lawyer practising in Bern. The applicant entered Switzerland in 1984.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130JUD002742695
30 novembre 2000
30 novembre 2000
He complained that more than six weeks had lapsed without the lawfulness of his detention having been examined by a court within the meaning of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, and that he had not been
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC002685510
5 juin 2012
5 juin 2012
The applicant argued under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been subjected to ill-treatment during his time in police custody.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3046321-3364973
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
She claimed that she had been the victim of discrimination as British pensioners were treated differently depending on their country of residence.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2417569-2613732
8 juillet 2008
8 juillet 2008
The applicants complained that they had not been elected to Parliament in 2002 because of the electoral threshold of 10% imposed nationally.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC001082607
28 juin 2011
28 juin 2011
The return receipt originating from the letter to the applicants’ lawyer indicated that in the absence of the latter, the letter had been deposited at the relevant post office and the lawyer had been notified
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121DEC005356007
21 janvier 2014
21 janvier 2014
Berg, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. 2. The Netherlands Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A. Böcker, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC003107405
7 décembre 2010
7 décembre 2010
5 had been in breach of Article 3 of the Convention and that the hearing before the Supreme Court of Ukraine had been in breach of the principles of the fairness and equality of arms enshrined in
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414DEC003173003
14 avril 2009
14 avril 2009
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the length of the criminal proceedings against him had been excessive and under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention that he had not been
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2194580-2344521
29 novembre 2007
29 novembre 2007
The Court observed that A.B. had been accused of homicide and had been convicted as charged and sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment twice by the first-instance court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0703DEC007214501
3 juillet 2003
3 juillet 2003
He maintained that the police had unlawfully seized the goods, that the goods had been plundered, and that the criminal charges against him had been unfounded.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0527DEC001342587
27 mai 1991
27 mai 1991
Bernt Mattsson introduced an application with the European Commission of Human Rights. It was registered under No. 13425/87.
Source officiellePage 42 sur 4750