Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145631
16 juin 2014
16 juin 2014
This authorisation, according to the Supreme Court, only entitled the holders of the procuration to perform, on behalf of the company, acts falling within the scope of substantive law.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC004873606
26 février 2008
26 février 2008
On both occasions he decided to return to Belarus in order to fight the regime by working for the opposition.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139132
15 novembre 2013
15 novembre 2013
These acts (demonstrations) are realised on behalf of the organisation within its knowledge and in line with its will.
Source officielleJCP- Juge Ctx Protection
697385fbcdc6046d476d4bc2
8 janvier 2026
8 janvier 2026
DOS SANTOS-MAISONNEUVE, avocats au barreau de CLERMONT-FERRAND C / Monsieur [Y] [O] GROSSE DÉLIVRÉE LE : A : SCP BERRAGUAS-TESSIER DOS SANTOS-MAISONNEUVE C.C.C.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142742
4 avril 2014
4 avril 2014
In particular, he noted that he had not been represented by a lawyer and that the judge had refused to hear witnesses on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196972
25 septembre 2019
25 septembre 2019
QUESTION As regards the Saratov Regional Court’s refusal to obtain the attendance of witnesses R., G., and K. on the applicant’s behalf, have the guarantees of the fair trial set out in Article
Source officielle5 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000008034147
29 décembre 2000
29 décembre 2000
Strasbourg a annulé pour excès de pouvoir, à la demande de M. et Mme Andrei X..., les arrêtés du 27 mai 1999 par lesquels le PREFET DU HAUT-RHIN a décidé qu'ils seraient reconduits à la frontière et fixé le Belarus
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169985
8 décembre 2016
8 décembre 2016
35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)348 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Association for the defence of human rights in Romania – Helsinki Committee on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126966
9 septembre 2013
9 septembre 2013
Diyarbakır Public Prosecutor on suspicion of aiding and abetting an illegal organisation, the PKK (Kurdish Workers’ Party), under Article 314 of the Criminal Code and making terrorist propaganda on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121016
14 mai 2013
14 mai 2013
She stated her intention to pursue the proceedings before the Court in her own name as well as on behalf of her late husband. 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC004738620
18 avril 2024
18 avril 2024
The applicant’s lawyer was also invited to submit by 1 February 2024 written observations in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with any claim for just satisfaction.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314DEC004871308
14 mars 2017
14 mars 2017
On 22 June 2016 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant sold his land to a third person and that they wished to continue the application on behalf of the latter.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2109
4 mars 2008
4 mars 2008
On the applicant’s behalf, her husband lodged an appeal against that refusal with the visa Appeals Board. The appeal was rejected for non-compliance by the applicant with the regulations in force.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC007814701
18 novembre 2003
18 novembre 2003
No communication has been received by or on behalf of the applicant since May 2002.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-673438-680647
20 décembre 2002
20 décembre 2002
Résumé des faits Comme beaucoup d’autres personnes qui vivaient dans les provinces orientales de la Pologne d’avant-guerre (dont de grandes parties se trouvent actuellement au Bélarus, en
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC002447204
30 août 2016
30 août 2016
No further letter was received on behalf of the applicant or of any of his potential heirs or close relatives. THE LAW 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC001516019
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
On 6 September 2021 the observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representative through the Court’s electronic communication service (eComms) inviting him to submit the observations on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1014DEC001491207
14 octobre 2014
14 octobre 2014
No heirs or close relatives have come forward to pursue the application on the applicant’s behalf. THE LAW 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002680515
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative through eComms inviting him to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC001761607
6 mai 2014
6 mai 2014
However, the letter was returned as unclaimed due to the applicant’s death and no heirs or relatives have expressed their wish to pursue the application on the applicant’s behalf.
Source officiellePage 42 sur 556