CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 012 résultats pour « Mompion »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC002997806

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

Section 3 of the 2006 Act provides for two remedies to expedite pending proceedings – a supervisory appeal ( nadzorstvena pritožba ) and a motion for a deadline ( rokovni predlog ) – and, ultimately, for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC006273000

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2003

13 mai 2003

On 8 February 2001 the Supreme Court dismissed his motion. On 10 May 2001 the Regional Court dismissed his appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217DEC005272799

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2002

17 décembre 2002

On 8 January 1992 the parties were heard by the District Court and the applicant was ordered to submit her motions for the hearing of evidence within 30 days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109763

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

cases of international child abduction in 33 cases the mediation resulted in an agreement as a final solution of the case (9 cases) or a voluntary return of a child (12 cases) or a withdrawal of a motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0519DEC003913707

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2009

19 mai 2009

The applicant filed a motion for retrospective leave to appeal out of time. The court remitted the motion to the applicant’s second legal-aid lawyer with a question as to whether he supported it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC004735599

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2003

13 mai 2003

On 29 March 1995 the applicant filed a motion for bias which was dismissed on 26 May 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103DEC001720603

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2009

3 novembre 2009

On 5 May 2003 the applicant requested the court to grant him retrospective leave to file a motion to have the written reasons of the judgment served on him.

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2010:SO01657

Cassation

14 septembre 2010

14 septembre 2010

mentale ou de compromettre son avenir professionnel ; qu'en l'espèce, en se fondant, pour retenir l'existence d'un tel harcèlement, sur l'émotion des collègues de travail de Mme X... traduite par une motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0311DEC007336901

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2003

11 mars 2003

On 3 May 2002 the Supreme Court dismissed his motion and transferred the case-file to the Regional Court. On 24 June 2002 the Regional Court appointed the Sárbogárd District Court to hear the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0421JUD006604601

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2005

21 avril 2005

    On 30 June 1989 the applicant, represented by his parents, filed a motion for medical malpractice against the three doctors who had assisted at his birth. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0629DEC004121798

Admin. suprême

29 juin 1999

29 juin 1999

However, he later returned to Lebanon on his own motion. Allegedly for fear of reprisals, he has not registered with the Lebanese authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158646

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2015

14 octobre 2015

The applicant appealed, arguing that the trial court had acted unlawfully in extending his detention of its own motion, without holding a hearing, and beyond the time-limit for detention authorised during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330DEC005700518

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2021

30 mars 2021

This motion has been the only reason for rescheduling of the appeal hearing. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC001323409

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2013

15 janvier 2013

During the ensuing trial the applicant lodged a motion seeking to be released by disputing the lawfulness of the court decisions of 13 January and 25 March 2009.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0122DEC001693705

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2008

22 janvier 2008

Proceedings before the German family courts In November 1997 the applicant lodged a motion for alimony for the time of their separation with the Westerburg District Court ( Amtsgericht ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160109

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2016

5 janvier 2016

Court for the applicants’ release, arguing that the maximum permissible period of detention of nine months had expired with respect to the applicants on 6 June 2007; however, the court rejected that motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165016

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2016

24 juin 2016

It appears from the documents in the case file that, following the institution of court proceedings, the applicant raised a motion before the Nizami District Court asking for suspension of the court proceeding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0612DEC001112302

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2007

12 juin 2007

On 16 August 1989 the applicant filed a motion with the Garwolin District Court for the division of property between her and her former husband from whom she had been divorced since 29 July 1988 and who

Source officielle
CC

cr

6079a7e49ba5988459c4b494

Cassation

12 juillet 1983

12 juillet 1983

NATIONALE DES ANCIENS COMBATTANTS DE LA RESISTANCE, ONT ADRESSE AUX ADHERENTS DU DEPARTEMENT DE L'ILLE-ET-VILAINE UNE LETTRE CIRCULAIRE AYANT TRAIT A DIVERSES QUESTIONS INTERNES A LAQUELLE ETAIT JOINTE UNE MOTION

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Lyon

DTA_2502464_20250324

Administratif

24 mars 2025

24 mars 2025

Bénéficiaire d'autorisations provisoires de séjour depuis 2022 en raison de l'état de santé de l'un de ses enfants, il a sollicité le 5 novembre 2024 la délivrance d'un titre de séjour portant la motion

Source officielle

Page 41 sur 351

← PrécédentSuivant →