V... ni l'acte de mariage de ce dernier et qu'il ne justifie pas, dès lors, d'une chaîne continue de filiation avec cet ascendant dont il dit tenir la nationalité française ; Qu'en statuant ainsi, alors

The registered letters either returned to the Court as unclaimed or were received by the applicants, to which they did not respond.

In the case of Olimpia-Maria Teodorescu v.

c'est dans l'exercice de son pouvoir souverain d'appréciation de la force probante des présomptions qui lui étaient soumises et qu'elle a examinées, que la cour d'appel a estimé que, si, avant son mariage

However, in this case the plaintiff did not oppose the intervener’s participation and nor did the court of its own motion find that the intervener had no legal interest.

It also appears that the applicant did not contribute to the cost of construction. 5 .

Following the death of Mrs Maria Margareta Dumitrescu on 10 November 1997, her heir Mrs Maria Cristina Mauc Dumitrescu, a French and Romanian national, expressed her wish, on 9 May 2000, to continue the

He submitted that the breakdown of their marriage was irretrievable. He did not request the court to rule on the question of who was at fault in respect of the breakdown of their marriage.

Italy 21/03/2023 Vincenzo MIGLIETTA 1943 Statte Italian Mario ROCCAFORTE 1) Application to the Labour Court of Taranto lodged on 11/02/2000 - Labour Court of Taranto – R.G.

action had been considered as representing an effective remedy (see, mutatis   mutandis , Polgar , §   96 and Vlad , § 23, both cited above; see the appended table for further details), but did

    Did the domestic courts’ refusal to reduce the applicants’ sentences of imprisonment [3] amount to a breach of Article 7 of the Convention (see, by way of comparison, Del Río Prada v.

At the hearing the applicant reduced the amount of her claim to SIT 2,160,000 (approximately 25,380 EUR) since the insurance did not provide for a higher cover. 6.

    The applicants did not specifically comment on this point.

After the marriage of one of the daughters her husband also moved in.

The Manisa Administrative Court, collecting information on its own motion from the Manisa Prosecutor’s Office, further found that the applicant had been identified as a person who had frequent telephone

The applicant also did not submit any evidence that he had paid any of the amounts claimed. 20.

> Au soutien de son appel, Mme [X] [G] fait valoir que la clause présente dans leur contrat de mariage instaure une présomption irréfragable de contribution aux charges du mariage de sorte que M.

Leisure Industries Ltd, celle-ci a conclu, le 1er janvier 2001, divers baux avec les sociétés [G] et Agence des remparts, dont le créancier poursuivant a sollicité judiciairement la nullité. 5.

Z... n'était créditeur que de la somme de 645 164 francs avant le mariage, et que par conséquent les deniers propres de M.