These courts took evidence at oral hearings. 6.     On 25 November 2008 the respondent filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court, requesting an oral hearing. 7.

took place on 13.06.2015; the applicant does not precise the exact dates of other court hearings.

  This allegedly amounted to a breach of the applicant's right to a hearing before an impartial and independent tribunal in the determination of his civil right to certain social benefits.

the hearing.

At the hearing held on 17 August 2000 the applicant's lawyer did not appear and the court had to adjourn the hearing.

The hearing of 10 October 1997 was postponed upon the request of the applicant’s lawyer who attended the hearing.

The Court’s assessment The Court reiterates that the entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article 6 §   1 necessarily implies a right to an “oral hearing”.

On 4 May 2001 the Supreme Administrative Court rejected the applicant’s appeal as unsubstantiated without hearing the parties.

that the hearing be adjourned.

He suffered progressive hearing loss, atrophy of the hearing nerves, myopia, and hyperglyceridemia. He was afraid of losing his hearing and wanted to be treated.

court held a hearing in camera.

At the hearing held on 6 February 1996, the court provided the defendants with the evidence previously submitted by the applicant and fixed the next hearing for 26 March 1996.

He did so and, at the same time, reiterated his request for a hearing. 21.

    On 26 January 1995 a hearing was held before the Słupsk Regional Court.

On 27   January   1998 the Wrocław Regional Court held a hearing. On 28   April   1998 the court adjourned a hearing at the request of the applicants’ lawyer.

reasons against holding a hearing.”

Slovakia - 44925/98 Judgment 1.6.2004 [Section IV] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of oral hearing in administrative proceedings: no violation Extract: “According

The applicant arrived late at the hearing, but was informed of the place and time of the next hearing.

reasons against holding a hearing.”