The lights had been switched off and the teachers had told him that he would be eaten by rats. The applicant had felt very frightened as he had once seen a rat in the lavatory room.

The same judges then had taken the decision to prosecute him, had tried the issues arising from his conduct, had determined his guilt and had imposed the sanction (a term of imprisonment) on him.

Those interviews had been followed by a report in October 2009 and had been supplemented by the testimony obtained by the applicant’s counsel.

The doctor who had tried to resuscitate A.N. stated that on 7   December 2006 she had checked his health and he had had no injuries.

Furthermore, when the second applicant had visited the hospital with A and B, the children had been noisy and unruly and staff had had to intervene to calm them.

If a plan of the plot had not been provided because the plot of land had not been measured and the documents relating to the plot had not been drawn up, the person asking to purchase the land had to be

They had held that, in principle, that war had had no reason to be of interest to Turkish citizens and that, if some had joined demonstrations and had committed acts of violence in response to the events

The applicant’s defence had consequently been conducted by lawyers, who had had to take part in a large number of hearings within a short space of time.

The two police officers had told her that since there had been problems with the car’s registration documents and she had not fastened her seatbelt she had to pay a fine.

While it was undisputed that they had been injured, it had not been established that their injuries had been caused by the police during the intervention.

    The article the applicant had put her name to had introduced the idea that Judge L.D.S. had carried out her professional duties unlawfully between 1980 and 1994, when she had worked as a

The applicant stated during the investigation that Z.B. had not had a fiancé and that he had not had any family problem.

He had had daily medical examinations since he started work at the bakery. On 28 November 2000 he had felt ill and complained to a doctor.

had had other serious consequences.

first been two people who had entered the shop and a third person had come in later and had then left again.

Furthermore, in taking its decision, it had had regard to the entire family situation and had relied on an expert report by a psychologist.

The applicants had had an interest in being reunited whereas the Swedish State had had an interest in regulating immigration and controlling public expenditure.

had been summoned and the judgement had been communicated at an incorrect address.

In reality these measures had had retroactive effect.