CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
cr
61372654cd58014677424b43
22 octobre 2003
identique à celle concernée par l'arrêt de condamnation de la cour d'appel de Toulouse en date du 12 mai 1999 (devenu définitif) et qu'il s'en déduisait que l'infraction était établie par déclaration des farines
Page 41 sur 1237
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO00706
30 novembre 2022
Linde Group, n'[était] pas encore connu, ni le prix et le nombre de titres potentiellement cédés définitivement fixés" et qu' "un projet de cession et d'offre publique d'achat simplifiée subséquente faisa
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219JUD002774622
19 décembre 2024
On 18 April 2019, the President of the Ljubljana District Court ordered that the family-related pending cases of Judge H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD000397605
20 janvier 2009
The Court reiterates that by guaranteeing the right to respect for family life, Article 8 presupposes the existence of a family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118JUD000504912
18 novembre 2014
limited to the core family (see Slivenko v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0308DEC002596013
8 mars 2016
of entry clearance had interfered with that family life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0730JUD001460910
30 juillet 2013
In 2009 the applicant applied for temporary release from prison on account of his family situation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0322JUD001130816
22 mars 2018
Pingen were also placed in a foster family. Their aunt’s family was approved as fosterers and they were then placed with them. 15. Since G.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11129
14 juin 2016
1: The applicant’s relationship with his late partner in a stable, same-sex, de facto union for more than eleven years fell within the notion of “private life” and “family life” within the meaning
ECLI:CEDH:002-11883
24 octobre 2017
Regular monitoring of the applicant’s family was then put in place.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1024JUD004595911
I.’s return to the family 61 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD001660809
5 février 2015
Family law applicable at the material time 64.
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-12164
30 octobre 2018
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life
ECLI:CEDH:002-13515
9 décembre 2021
After a fight in the family home in February 2013, the applicant’s parental authority over X was suspended and her contact rights with him were limited. X was placed in care.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209JUD005348713
The father had not opposed to X being temporarily placed in a family support centre. X was placed in a family support centre and afterwards started living with his father.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13296
15 juin 2021
Russia - 17665/17 Judgment 15.6.2021 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Insufficient assessment as to existence of “grave risk” in returning abducted child under the Hague Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD006642409
1 juillet 2021
Prisoner’s contact with his family 54.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD001293720
23 novembre 2021
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD003521409
The State authorities shall ensure that the family is afforded social, economic and legal protection. ...” B. The Civil Code 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD004093816
On 16 February 2011 E. was placed in the care of the Cerknica Centre on the basis of section 201 of the Marriage and Family Relations Act (hereinafter “the Family Act” – see paragraph 60