CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0616JUD000173513
16 juin 2022
As regards the third Engel criterion, the applicants asserted that the fines were higher than many criminal fines, calculated on the basis of the value of the unlawful constructions, which could result
Page 41 sur 80
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130DEC003966598
30 janvier 2001
However, it is not disputed that the applicability of Article 6 falls to be assessed on the basis of the three criteria outlined in the Engel judgment (Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD001123012
16 février 2021
The Court’s established case-law sets out three criteria, commonly known as the “Engel criteria”, to be considered in determining whether or not there was a “criminal charge” (see Engel and Others v. the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0611JUD000524204
11 juin 2009
» ( Engel et autres c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1029JUD002493504
29 octobre 2013
En renvoyant aux critères établis par sa jurisprudence constante quant à l’existence ou non d’une « accusation en matière pénale » ( Engel et autres c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1201JUD000808008
1 décembre 2011
Irlande (n o 3) , 1 er juillet 1961, pp. 51-53, § 14, série A n o 3, et, mutatis mutandis , Ječius , précité, §§ 50-51, et Engel et autres c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD003811018
27 mai 2025
En l’affaire Engels c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0305JUD006929112
5 mars 2020
; » ( Engel et autres c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD003204211
14 janvier 2014
The Court’s established case-law sets out three criteria, commonly known as the “ Engel criteria” (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22), to be considered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD004685706
20 mai 2010
In the case of Engel v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002271593
15 mai 1996
Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 25, para. 58).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC003275416
3 juillet 2018
The Court’s established case-law sets out three criteria, commonly known as the “ Engel criteria” (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, §§ 82-83, Series A no. 22)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125JUD001838404
25 novembre 2008
#xa0; la classification de l’infraction au niveau interne, b) la nature de l’infraction et c) le degré de gravité de la sanction dont est passible la personne concernée ( Engel
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212DEC000079216
12 février 2019
After analysing in detail the exclusion measure on the basis of the three criteria commonly known as the “ Engel criteria” (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210JUD001377718
10 décembre 2024
To interpret the concept of “criminal offence” the Court has used the “Engel criteria” developed in Engel and Others v. the Netherlands (8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC004562499
6 février 2003
Convention in cases such as the present one, the Court must bear in mind the particular characteristics of military life and its effects on the situation of individual members of the armed forces (see Engel
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0312DEC001050983
12 mars 1987
; de la requête N° 10509/83 présentée par Rémi ENCKELS
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125DEC002361220
25 novembre 2021
Norvège (précité, § 107), les critères Engel constituent le modèle à suivre pour déterminer aux fins de l’application de l’article 4 du Protocole n o 7 si la procédure en cause est
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0303DEC002438294
3 mars 1995
"Verdachte heeft zich met anderen schuldig gemaakt aan diefstal van twee opleggers met containers waarvan de inhoud alleen al een waarde van enkele
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0302DEC002083192
2 mars 1994
Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34 et seq., para. 82), these proceedings concerned offences of a disciplinary nature and resulted in a typically disciplinary sanction