Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2765162-3025664
11 juin 2009
11 juin 2009
Having been subjected to detentions and violence by the Turkish authorities because of his political convictions and his work as a journalist, he left Turkey and swam to Greece in 2007.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000446902
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000913802
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Novska Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231318
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
of the nature of the rights at stake and because of the fact that similar fines had been imposed on other fishermen who likewise had not had the benefit of an oral hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325DEC003468708
25 mars 2010
25 mars 2010
these witnesses live in the territory of Serbia and Montenegro and, although properly summoned, failed to appear at the hearing, and because summonses for the witnesses D.K. , G.P. and R.P. could not
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0325DEC007322301
25 mars 2004
25 mars 2004
On 23 July 2002 an investigator of the Khabarovsk Regional prosecutor's office dropped several charges against the applicant because no evidence in their support could be found.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-149172
3 décembre 2014
3 décembre 2014
He was informed that he could not leave the country because a travel ban had been imposed on him.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2715295-2963310
21 avril 2009
21 avril 2009
4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily), in view of the length of proceedings before the Romanian courts; a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), because
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705DEC001757820
5 juillet 2022
5 juillet 2022
Likewise, while complaining about the breach of his freedom of assembly, he failed to specify which public gatherings he could not attend because of the measures in question.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224236
20 mars 2023
20 mars 2023
The applicant further alleged that the trial against her had been unfair because, even though she had been convicted on the basis of the unlawful surveillance of her phone conversations and activities
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1122DEC001166017
22 novembre 2022
22 novembre 2022
It held that the principle of ne bis in idem was not applicable because the proceedings before it had been brought in order to protect public property from unlawful use, whereas in the previous set of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000949213
21 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
Because they were not paid in full, the applicant sued her command.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:1219DEC000493371
19 décembre 1972
19 décembre 1972
The applicant states that he did not consider making any further petitions to the Home Office after his treatment in 1971, because he expected that any further petitions would be rejected like the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204DEC000573003
4 décembre 2008
4 décembre 2008
The judgment of 24 July 1998 had been outside the scope of Article 6 because it concerned discharge from military service.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155550
29 mai 2015
29 mai 2015
Partnership Act ( Eingetragene Partnerschaft-Gesetz ) did not correspond to their idea of an institutionalised partnership as it was in many ways lighter ( lockerer ) than a traditional civil marriage, and because
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14245
21 novembre 2023
21 novembre 2023
The Regional Court acquitted the applicants of the first offence and discharged them from prosecution for the second one as it considered that the above law did not apply because the gathering – which
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207452
9 décembre 2020
9 décembre 2020
The applicant had to return to D.’s flat because the children had not yet recovered. On 11 January 2020 D. slapped her again. 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000935513
21 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
Because they were not paid in full, the applicant sued his command.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192044
1 mars 2019
1 mars 2019
The applicant was not elected to the municipality and the deposit was not returned to him because the candidate list the applicant belonged to did not attain three per cent of votes.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229620
23 novembre 2023
23 novembre 2023
On 11 July 2014 the applicant NGO lodged a defamation claim against a local media company and its journalist because of an article written by the journalist and published in the newspaper run by the company
Source officiellePage 41 sur 1499