There was, however, no evidence that the applicant’s wife had not complied with the judicial contact order.

On 6 February 2005 a road traffic accident took place in Ankara which resulted in the deaths of four persons, including the applicant’s wife, son and daughter.

The evidence of the applicant’s wife did not support his claims in this respect.

Hüseyin Mavideniz was then brought to Limassol police station together with his wife and their two children. 54.

#The Queen, auf Antrag von Mayer Parry Recycling Ltd, gegen Environment Agency und Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Beteiligte: Corus (UK) Ltd und Allied Steel and Wire

After concluding that the first applicant and his wife had not had sufficient income, the national courts ordered the forfeiture as proceeds of crime of a plot of land in Plovdiv with a seven-storey office

On 21 October 2017 his wife, who is currently residing in Syria, sought to be reunited with the applicant. On 17 January 2018 the Migration Agency rejected her application.

Following communication of the application to the Government, the President of the Second Section decided – in spite of the applicant's request to represent himself or to be represented by his wife – that

The applicant asked judge K. of the District Court to which the case was assigned to withdraw from the case given that Sh.’s wife was a judge of the same court.

l'administration fiscale avait réintégré à bon droit dans les produits de sa filiale VASF, au titre des exercices clos de 2005 à 2009, les indemnités de gérance dues par les sociétés Yantai Changyu Castel Wine

code général des impôts, compte tenu de l'apparence qu'elle avait elle-même créée en se présentant aux yeux des tiers, comme propriétaire des parts dans le capital des sociétés Yantai Changyu Castel Wine

    The circumstances of the case The applicant’s wife died on 24 June 2000. There was one child of the marriage, born in 1998.

On 21   June 2003 the applicant’s wife gave birth to a girl W. The applicant submits that in 2005 his wife informed him that he was not W.’s father.

Turkey - 36607/06 Judgment 4.6.2019 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Refusal to appoint a teacher to a post abroad because his wife wore a veil: violation Facts – The applicant

The psychiatrist concluded in a report drawn up on 10   October 1995 that the applicant was suffering from acute paranoid schizophrenia and was not therefore responsible for the murder of his wife

The inspector’s report mentioned the applicant’s well-known religious beliefs and stated that the applicant’s wife wore the Islamic veil.

On an unspecified date the applicant’s wife was allocated a flat in Zagreb for her use.

  The new rules remove the difference of treatment between husbands and wives which the Court found to be in violation of Article 14 taken with Article 8 (art. 14+8) of the European Convention.