CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 088 résultats pour « Tonnard »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1205DEC002906106

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2017

5 décembre 2017

    Towards the end of 2001 the first applicant and on 12 February 2002 the second applicant initiated administrative proceedings before the Ankara Administrative Court. 5.

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 355

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1324

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2009

15 septembre 2009

The respondent State had therefore failed to discharge its positive obligations towards them. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). Article 41: EUR 8,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11243

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

the absence of a strict inspection mechanism might not pose a problem in view of their nature and limited extent, the respondent State in the instant case had borne a more compelling responsibility towards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188493

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

He accused the members of his family of reprehensible conduct towards him. The Gryfice District Court appointed a legal aid lawyer for the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2353

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2007

20 décembre 2007

States, a significant number did not set a limitation period for children to bring a paternity suit (in contrast with the position where the claimant was the father) and a tendency could be discerned towards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-116389

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

As the non resident parent she was required to contribute towards her children’s upbringing and in 2001 the relevant legislation provided for a reduced amount when the absent parent was in a relationship

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-846

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

obligation on an absent parent to pay money to the parent with custody could be regarded as an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions; moreover, the sums the applicant paid towards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233702

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2024

15 avril 2024

The applicants complain under Article 3 of the Convention that, in all domestic proceedings, the authorities failed to sanction J.N.’s behaviour towards the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250559

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2026

13 mai 2026

imposed on the applicant a one-match ban from entering the dressing room and the bench area, as well as a fine of 58,500   Turkish liras (approximately 1,590 euros (EUR)) for unsportsmanlike conduct towards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7298

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

In addition, while the clear trend among the Contracting States is towards allowing the use of unauthorised medicinal products, there is no consensus on the precise manner in which this is regulated, nor

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-264

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

The experts’ reports had found that the period that had elapsed without adequate contact between the applicant and his son had played a decisive role in the child’s attitude of rejection towards his father

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-241749

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2025

10 janvier 2025

the door to enter the cell, they were under impression that the applicant would throw (or indeed threw) a metal cup at them, and would potentially also throw a basin containing his cellmate’s blood towards

Source officielle
CC

soc

6079b15d9ba5988459c51deb

Cassation

2 avril 1992

2 avril 1992

X..., entré le 17 mars 1975 au service de la société Merrell Toraude, devenue société Merrell Dow France, en qualité de directeur régional, a été nommé le 1er janvier 1978 chef des ventes export avant

Source officielle
CC

comm

61372342cd580146774077a0

Cassation

16 février 1999

16 février 1999

ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Mme Nicole Y..., représentant la société Etablissements Y..., domiciliée société Les Etablissements Y..., zone industrielle des Tourrades

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602JUD001332002

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2015

2 juin 2015

They then started driving towards the Pergamos checkpoint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204JUD000882522

Admin. suprême

4 février 2025

4 février 2025

He considered the context of the post and commentary as offensive and inciting hostility and hatred towards the LGBT social group, as well as encouraging extremist actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002037317

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

Therefore, all the circumstances of the event at issue, such as the place, manner and communication of the accused with the spectators, show that the accused directed messages towards the spectators at

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD002955513

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

CROATIA (Application no. 29555/13)     JUDGMENT   Art 8 • Positive obligations • Private life • Inadequate response of domestic authorities to secondary school teacher’s verbal abuse towards

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0605JUD002118015

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2025

5 juin 2025

He perceives the treatment as a punishment and evidence of a biased attitude towards him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD005535117

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

It should also be noted that the applicant did not submit any evidence to suggest that [A.I.] had been violent towards her and the children before the decision to divorce.”

Source officielle