The Government maintained that such remedies are effective both in theory and in practice. The applicant did not contest this argument of the Government.

They further contended that the investigation of the incident was pending, that there was no evidence that the men had been State agents and that there were therefore no grounds for holding the State liable

to the Convention, and that there was no reason to order their remittal through an administrative act.

It appears that many of his colleagues had purchased the flats they were renting from their employer under this provision.

He states that he was beaten up by the special police units during the violent dispersal of protesters on 30   November 2013.

Février 1966 à BOULOGNE SUR MER (62200) ... 62480 LE PORTEL Représenté par Me Eric LAFORCE, membre de la SELARL Eric LAFORCE, avocats au barreau de DOUAI anciennement avoués à la Cour Assisté de Me Thierry

They further contended that the investigation of the incident was pending, that there was no evidence that the men had were State agents and that there were therefore no grounds for holding the State liable

No direct evidence in support of the theory that Ch. had ill-treated Z. had been discovered. Even assuming that the two disclosed instances of Z. being beaten by Ch.

He came to the Hospital because he felt secure there. The receiving doctor stated that the applicant was calm, oriented, smiling, had no tension or anxiety but had paranoia.

The Government maintained that the seizure was justified under the third rule. 32.

They contended that the applicant could have relied directly on the Convention and the Court’s case-law in the matter.

    Lastly, they doubted that a pension was the applicant’s only income. 60.

They concluded by stating that the applicant had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies available under domestic law. 27.

Their assertions are still that the case has grounds and that they will be prepared to bring charges.” 16.

They also claimed that there had been no interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly. 2.     The applicant 47.

As the applicants had been the first at the scene, they contended that they had been entitled to engage in salvage.

Lastly, the IQC found that there had been some circumstances that had called into question the applicant’s professionalism and ethics; however, they had not constituted sufficient grounds for concluding

, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de M.

Accordingly, the Court considers that there is no call to award him any sum on that account. 65.