On 31 May 1983 the applicant instituted divorce proceedings   before the District Court of Santa Maria Capua Vetere.     17.

The fourth and fifth applicants did so in 2000. 9.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le quinze décembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt

Accordingly, they did not have the necessary legal powers to represent the child’s interests.

    Dit qu’il y a eu violation de l’article   6 §   1 de la Convention   ;   3.

Asserting their property rights as the applicants did, under general civil law, was not permissible. 3.     Final domestic decision 13.

San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000). 20.

Palla Lizardo, lawyers practising in Lisbon and Funchal, respectively; the decision to give notice of the application to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms Maria

The plaintiffs' lawyer did not object. On 10 and 11 December 2001 the first and third defendants filed their appearance respectively.

The defence indicated that the rehearing of the witnesses was “redundant” and that they did not wish to put forward any witnesses. 7 .

She did not contest the authenticity of the messages submitted as evidence by T.A.

Constitutional Court’s decisions declaring the amparo appeals lodged by the first, second, seventh, eight and tenth applicants partially inadmissible for non-exhaustion of previous judicial remedies, did

The Government submitted that Mr Viorel Coșcodar did not have locus   standi to continue the current application due to his failure to submit an heir certificate and to show a strong moral interest

  The applicant did not dispute the facts as presented by the Government.

    The Government did not express an opinion on the matter. 14.     The Court considers that the applicants must have sustained some non-pecuniary damage.

The applicant did not dispute those facts.

PEÑA et autres contre le Portugal introduite le 26 juillet 2010 EXPOSÉ DES FAITS EN FAIT Les requérants, M me Pilar Moreno Diaz Peña, M.

Vu le recours formé par : APPELANT DANS LA PROCEDURE 08/00719 Maître [K] [C] [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] représenté par Me Maris ORE DIAZ, avocat au Barreau de Paris toque C 2130 APPELANT DANS

The applicant did not dispute the facts as presented by the Government.