on 17 September 1992, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention as regards the applicant's detention on remand from 9 October 1996 to 5 December 1996;   - held that there had been no

Accordingly, the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 13.

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

; Whereas in its judgment of 24 June 1993 the Court unanimously: - declared the Government estopped from pleading the applicants’ lack of victim status and on failure to exhaust domestic remedies; - held

The Court found that those facts caused her to suffer distress and anguish.

Italy the Court held by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.

It held 49% of the shares in a Ukrainian public company, Sovtransavto-Lougansk.

    The Regional Court held hearings on 13   January and 25   August   1994. At the hearing held on 27   October   1994 the applicant modified his claim.

Switzerland; 26.8.1997, De Haan v. the Netherlands   In the case of Helle v.

It held, in particular, that the applicant had participated in the assembly held from 20 February to 1 March 2008, during which he had availed himself of his freedom of expression by freely imparting information

In 1994 and 1995 the trial court held in total seven hearings. Some of them were adjourned due to the absence of the defendant. On 19 April and 8 July 1996 hearings were held.

Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

In the resumed proceedings, on 30 November 1993, 22 November 1995 and 1 February 1996 the District Court held hearings.

In sum, the circumstances of the administrative claim against the applicant were substantiated.

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards him EUR   10,500 under that head. B.     Costs and expenses 31.

Several men tread on the applicant’s back and head. Then they took him to another room and had him seated on the couch. They kept questioning him about N.’s murder.

  A hearing was held on 21 March 2000.

again held in cell no. 6, but this time with five cellmates; -     between 15 and 18 June 2004 he was held with nine cellmates in cell no. 4, which measured around 18 square metres and was equipped