After his grandfather had died and the applicant had finished the secondary school, in June 2011 he   joined his family in Russia. 7.

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect

life” in its usual meaning, that sufficed to establish the applicability of the “family life” aspect of Article   8.

The Court of Appeal referring, inter alia, to section 155 of the Act on Procedure in Family Matters, refused the request.

However, in proceedings in which the length of the proceedings has a clear impact on the applicant’s family life a more rigid approach is called for which obliges the States to put into place a remedy

At the same time, the court notes the continuous nature of family relations.

Russia - 47220/19 Judgment 6.7.2021 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Restriction of applicant’s parental rights and deprivation of contact with her children without required

    The applicant alleged that his right to respect for his private and family life had been violated by various restrictions on family visits imposed on him during his detention, and complained

    Everyone   has the right to respect for his private and family life   .... 2.

It was alleged that this amounted to inhuman treatment under Article 3 of the Convention in relation to the applicant and his family members, whose rights to respect for their private and family life had

However, the children obtained Danish nationality because of their family ties to their father.

life Restrictions on the length and conditions of family visits to a person held in detention in a remand prison: violation Article 35 Article 35-1 Six-month period Starting point for the six-month period

Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

However, the children obtained Danish nationality because of their family ties to their father.

between biological family members. 57 .

The court found that any hypothetical interference with the applicant’s family life was in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society.

L. 743-24 du Code de l’Entrée et du Séjour des Etrangers et du Droit d’Asile; Vu l’article R. 213-12-2 du code de l’organisation judiciaire ; En présence de Monsieur [O] [M], interprète en langue farsi

dépendances et extensions que des produits faisant l'objet de l'activité de la SA MOULINS DUMEE Depuis le 28 juillet 2024 pour les remboursements des prêts et le 6 aout 2024 pour le paiement des factures de farines