Investigative Service had failed to take timely action to investigate the disappearance of his son, had failed to identify any suspects and to collect the necessary evidence and had failed to effectively cooperate

judgments against a State ‒ in the case of enforcement against a private party, a creditor is not relieved of the duty to initiate separate enforcement proceedings, actively participate in them and cooperate

It upheld the decision, stating, inter alia , that there had been reasons to request complementary examinations, that the applicant had refused to cooperate and, that, accordingly, his entitlement to benefits

M.E. continuously failed to cooperate with the court and as a result an interim decision was issued only in May 2006.

In particular, parties are required to cooperate with the Court and to participate effectively in the procedure fixed by the Court (see Rules 44A to 44C of the Rules of Court).

They had demonstrated a willingness to cooperate with prison department officials.

The applicant had denied several times the press rumours about his leaving the country, and on 11 May 2010 he also indicated to the authorities his willingness to cooperate.

The applicant had been afforded the possibility of applying to the domestic court to keep the child in her home and she had been able to express before it her willingness to cooperate in order to facilitate

The applicants failed to cooperate fully with the Court. 7.     Referring to its previously examined requests for revision (see Cangöz and Others v.

64886/01, §§   104-107, ECHR   2006 V); that in applications nos. 25424/06 and 36636/06 the applicants’ final decisions had only been partially enforced as the applicants have failed to cooperate

F. and Fr. pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with the prosecution. They testified that the applicant had been responsible for the organisation of the drug purchase and trafficking.

(a) Complaints alleging the community’s destructive influence and alleged failure to cooperate in investigating them – A religious community’s refusal to allow the authorities to take appropriate measures

    The Court emphasises that under Rule 44 A: “The parties have a duty to cooperate fully in the conduct of the proceedings and, in particular, to take such action within their power as the

PARIS, vestiaire #D1538 VERRE SOLUTIONS NOUVELLE DENOMINATION SAINT GOBAIN GLASS SOLITIONS GRAND OUEST venant aux droits de SAINT GOBAIN GLASS SOLUTIONS PARIS NORMANDIE 10 LES GRANDES BOSSES 44220 COUERON

He refused to cooperate without a lawyer. On 30 June 2009 the applicant was allowed to make two phone calls to the Consulate of the Netherlands but they were not able to assist him.

Demanderesse : Société TRANSPORTS RICHARD 22 route de Saint-Etienne de Montluc 44220 COUERON Représentée par Maître Guillaume ROLAND, avocat au barreau de PARIS (non comparant - dispensé de comparution

Société BWH HOTEL GROUP FRANCE prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux [Adresse 4] [Localité 3] immatriculée au RCS de Nanterre sous le numéro 319 641 551 Représentée par Me Laurent COMPEROT

Vu 1°), sous le n° 260767, la requête, enregistrée le 3 octobre 2003 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par la SOCIETE TECHNA S.A., dont le siège est à Les Lardes de Bauche à Coueron

It further reiterates that the respondent Government are not released from the duty to cooperate with the Court.