Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12742
23 janvier 2020
23 janvier 2020
also concern, among other aspects, France’s jurisdiction and responsibility for the purposes of Article 1 of the Convention in this extraterritorial context, and the applicants’ standing to act on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625DEC003111613
25 juin 2020
25 juin 2020
However, no heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on the applicant’s behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626DEC002785803
26 juin 2018
26 juin 2018
In the proceedings before the Court, Filippo Serino acted on his own behalf and on behalf of his sister Lucia Serino, in respect of whom he had been conferred a general power of attorney.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212348
16 septembre 2021
16 septembre 2021
Under Article 8 of the Convention, the first applicant complains on her behalf and on behalf of the child about the length of the proceedings and that allegedly the domestic courts failed to take into
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC002854906
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s mother, who wished to pursue the application on behalf of the applicant. She was invited to submit her own observations.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309DEC003518215
9 mars 2023
9 mars 2023
Government’s written observations in Albanian and English were sent to the applicant’s representative who was invited to submit by 9 June 2022 any written observations she wished to make in reply on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC004234206
21 mars 2017
21 mars 2017
The first applicant died after lodging the current application and the second applicant expressed his wish to continue the proceedings both on his behalf and on behalf of the first applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199634
2 décembre 2019
2 décembre 2019
under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention that the domestic courts failed (1) to ensure his participation in the appeal proceedings or (2) to obtain attendance of witness T. on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC000231719
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit her observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-3631
24 novembre 2005
24 novembre 2005
Deux experts relevèrent notamment que, d’après une carte figurant dans le calendrier, certains territoires du Bélarus, de la Pologne et de la Russie étaient « des territoires ethniquement lituaniens
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-14350
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
dessaisissement) - 42120/21 Article 3 Expulsion Allégations par des ressortissants afghans d’un risque de subir en Afghanistan un traitement contraire à la Convention, en cas de renvoi vers le Bélarus
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231185
22 janvier 2024
22 janvier 2024
Robert Arsenovych BORANYAN against Ukraine lodged on 17 May 2021 communicated on 22 January 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The present application, lodged by a father (the first applicant) on his own behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC000399016
18 janvier 2024
18 janvier 2024
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s lawyer, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleJuge social
DTA_2400182_20240319
19 mars 2024
19 mars 2024
Il soutient que le requérant et sa famille sont hébergés à l'hôtel Massillia Benauge, 119 rue de la Benauge à Bordeaux, depuis le 15 septembre 2023. Vu les autres pièces du dossier.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831DEC005556911
31 août 2023
31 août 2023
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms) inviting him to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC002371604
27 juin 2017
27 juin 2017
-D.R. could not be considered as representatives of the applicant association, in so far as they had not submitted any document proving their mandate entitling them to act on its behalf or on behalf of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127376
27 septembre 2013
27 septembre 2013
On 20 December 2004 the applicant was arrested in Minsk (Belarus).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0523JUD006923511
23 mai 2013
23 mai 2013
Non-violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Belarus);Non-violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006004510
5 juin 2012
5 juin 2012
Partiellement irrecevable;Non-violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditionnel) (Belarus);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630JUD003902817
30 juin 2022
30 juin 2022
Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Belarus);Violation de l'article 4 du Protocole n° 4 - Interdiction des expulsions collectives d'étrangers-{général};Violation
Résumé IA — à vérifierPage 40 sur 556