Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0608DEC003796602
8 juin 2006
8 juin 2006
The court considered it possible to hold the hearing in the applicant’s absence because the applicant had not appointed a representative, because he had been duly notified about the time and place of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1219DEC007800801
19 décembre 2002
19 décembre 2002
On 11 August 1994 the first applicant filed an action for damages in the Zadar Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zadru ) against the Croatia Insurance Company ( Croatia osiguranje ), because the building
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-936026-963627
17 février 2004
17 février 2004
Mr Thampibillai submitted that in August 1990 his father was shot dead by the Sri Lankan Army because they suspected him of helping the LTTE. As a result, his brother joined the LTTE.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0227DEC003033896
27 février 1997
27 février 1997
It found that the order for detention with a view to expulsion was lawful because it was necessary in order to secure the applicant's removal.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD000524906
15 janvier 2009
15 janvier 2009
He had complied with the six-month rule, because his first application to the Court had been dated 13 December 2005.
Source officielleM1 S1 Contentieux Général
68ee9d1722996ce54482737b
6 octobre 2025
6 octobre 2025
GRUPPO LA NONNA Expédition le : à : la SELARL BERTHAUD ET ASSOCIÉS Exécutoire le : à : la SELARL BERTHAUD ET ASSOCIÉS Minute n° TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE BEAUVAIS RÉPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE
Source officielle1ère chambre civile A
60347bd5cb7f7369c4ca93ec
1 décembre 2016
1 décembre 2016
Date des plaidoiries tenues en audience publique : 12 octobre 2016 Date de mise à disposition : 1er décembre 2016 Composition de la Cour lors des débats et du délibéré : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE C
6034ea38b5e0b615c166649f
2 septembre 2016
2 septembre 2016
disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la Cour, les parties en ayant été préalablement avisées dans les conditions prévues à l'article 450 alinéa 2 du code de procédure civile ; Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleChambre Commerciale
615e0d9ec25a97f0381f4e57
16 octobre 2014
16 octobre 2014
DÉBATS : A l'audience publique du 18 Septembre 2014 Monsieur BERNAUD, Conseiller, a été entendu en son rapport, Les avocats ont été entendus en leurs conclusions, Puis l'affaire a été
Source officielleciv3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:C300857
24 juin 2014
24 juin 2014
Sabourin, pris en qualité de liquidateur de la société Foch et associés, la somme de 3 000 euros et à la société civile professionnelle Christian Bernaud et Eric Quintana la somme de 3 000 euros ; rejette
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001511202
29 janvier 2004
29 janvier 2004
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115817
14 décembre 2012
14 décembre 2012
She submitted that because of her old age (she was 80 years old) it was hard for her to visit her son.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160654
15 janvier 2016
15 janvier 2016
The applicant claimed that he did not attend because of his poor state of health, notably feelings of “panic” and a severe depression, and produced a medical certificate of 23 October 2014.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169394
9 novembre 2016
9 novembre 2016
The applicant also stated that he had never named any specific person in the courts whom he would have bribed because he had not intended to perform such an action.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC000976102
23 octobre 2003
23 octobre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Split Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC003005213
12 mai 2015
12 mai 2015
The applicant’s visiting rights were limited, mainly because of her manipulative behavior.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0615DEC005667900
15 juin 2000
15 juin 2000
The applicant also alleges a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because of the decision to deprive him of his retirement benefits, including his pension. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001530802
29 janvier 2004
29 janvier 2004
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1109DEC001297287
9 novembre 1987
9 novembre 1987
As was later explained by the Judicial Office, in a letter dated 17 June 1986, the latter refusal was not only because the application had been made out of time, but also because it was considered
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001386202
29 janvier 2004
29 janvier 2004
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officiellePage 40 sur 1499