Article 217 § 1 read, in so far as relevant, as follows: “(...) detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the authority at whose disposal he remains], unless the authority decides otherwise.”

Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. At the relevant time it provided: “1.

The detention order was based on Articles 210 § 1 and 217 § 1(2) and (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The detention order was based on Articles 210 § 1 and 217 § 1(2) and (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision, in the version applicable until 1 January 1996, provided: “1.

    Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision, in the version applicable until 1 January 1996, provided: “1.

the conclusions specified under (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 of that Article.

    Article 214 § 1 reads as follows: “Unless exceptions are provided for in the present Chapter, a detainee shall enjoy at least the same rights as are secured to a convicted person serving

    Article 214 § 1 reads as follows: “Unless exceptions are provided for in the present Chapter, a detainee shall enjoy at least the same rights as are secured to a convicted person serving

Article 249 § 1 sets out the general grounds for imposition of the preventive measures. That provision reads: “1.

Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand.

The prosecutor relied on Article 217 § 1 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences as in force at the material time. 15.

Those acts fell within the scope of privately ‑ prosecutable offences specified in Article 217 § 1 of the CC (breach of personal inviolability) or 157 § 2 of the CC (causing light bodily injuries

Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision, in the version applicable until 1 January 1996, provided: “1.

Article 249 § 1 sets out the general grounds for imposition of the preventive measures. That provision reads: “1.

Article 217 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant: “... a detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the authority at whose disposal he remains], unless the authority decides otherwise.”

    Article 217 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “(...) detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the authority at whose disposal he remains], unless the authority decides

Article 217 § 1, as applicable at the material time, read, in so far as relevant: “... a detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the authority at whose disposal he remains], unless the authority

[P] avait la qualité d'éleveur au sens de l'article L.214-6 du code rural, en ce qu'il l'a débouté de ses demandes fondées sur l'application des dispositions des articles L.217-1 et suivants du code de