CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0218JUD003208811
18 février 2025
THE LAW Preliminary issues 7. Having regard to its case-law on the matter ( compare Hadjithomas and Others v. Turkey , no.
Page 4 sur 29
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD004359004
19 juillet 2011
Land register 31. The land register is a land survey information system which consists of registers and cadastral maps. 32.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC003767810
27 mai 2014
time.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0416JUD004725719
16 avril 2026
Having regard to its case-law ( see, mutatis mutandis, Dickmann and Gion v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164550
10 juin 2016
On 24 February 2015 leave to appeal was refused on the ground that there was no arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at that time, bearing
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002305503
14 février 2006
unknown to the court at that time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1116DEC004636506
16 novembre 2010
THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC002251516
2 mai 2017
No building permit existed at the relevant time in regard to this land. 4. In 1994 or thereabouts works were being carried out in the valley situated below the applicants’ land.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD004566805
28 mars 2017
Article 49 of the Land Code provided at the time: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD002938511
25 novembre 2021
Law on recognition of property rights to plots of land in possession (use) by natural and legal persons (Recognition Act of 2007) 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD004575110
16 mai 2019
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 31.
civ2
61372471cd58014677415895
24 février 2005
suivant : Sur le moyen unique, tel que reproduit en annexe : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Grenoble, 15 octobre 2003) que les locaux, propriété de la société Sogefim, loués à la SCI Les Sept Laux
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13137
16 février 2021
Law – Article 6 § 1: Where an appeal lay against a decision by an administrative authority which might be to the detriment of directly affected third parties, a system needed to be in place enabling those
Pôle 4 - Chambre 3
6163c63af3112a7c58687429
20 mai 2010
L'affaire a été débattue le 24 Mars 2010, en audience publique, devant la Cour composée de : Madame Nicole PAPAZIAN, Présidente Mme Isabelle REGHI, Conseillère, entendue en son rapport Madame Michèle TIMBERT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3040404-3357479
23 février 2010
About two months later, the district court ordered the applicant’s detention on remand on the grounds that there was a risk of flight.
Cour d'Appel
6253cdc5bd3db21cbdd946bc
17 avril 2019
Représentée par Me Michèle RICHARD LENTALI, substituant Me Valerie BOZZI de la SELARL BOZZI TIBERI BATTINI, avocats au barreau d'AJACCIO INTIMEE : URSSAF DE LA CORSE Contentieux [...] [...]
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD003706818
30 avril 2026
781/2008) before the Supreme Court, which at the material time exercised first-instance jurisdiction in administrative ‑ law cases.
comm
61372411cd58014677411da6
19 novembre 2003
X... étant désigné comme liquidateur ; que la société Cabinet Loiselet père et fils Daigremont, la société Masson, la société Duthoit, la société PG Lance et la société Axa global risks (les assurés) ont
ECLI:CEDH:003-2614299-2843949
22 janvier 2009
The European Court of Human Rights, taking into account the timely and full discharge by the applicant company of its VAT reporting obligations, its inability to secure compliance by its supplier with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129DEC005154209
29 novembre 2011
No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.