Bekauri, lawyers practising in Tbilisi. 2.     The Georgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L. Meskhoradze, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.

    The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law, repeating the same grounds and complaining that none of the courts having heard her case had taken the steps necessary in order to summon

sparing it from the introduction of unmeritorious complaints and, once proceedings have been instituted, then meticulously abide by all the relevant rules of the procedure and urge their clients to do the same

He had left Bellapais by car to go to Kyrenia to meet his fiancée.

The said properties were registered as follows: (a) Bellapais, plot no. 53/1, sheet/plan XII/36W2, registration no. 1305, one room; share: 1/16; area: 14 m²; (b) Bellapais, plot no. 52/4, sheet/plan XII

Bekauri (criminal case no.   11), N. Butkhuzi (criminal case no. 13) and V. Begheluri and G.

    On the same date, the applicant initiated proceedings before the Sarajevo Municipal Court (“the Municipal Court”) seeking to establish the validity of a purchase contract and to register

On the same day Mr   Kulbach signed a completed application form and dispatched it to the Court from Limoges on 8   April   2021. 3.

The same applies if important new developments have occurred during the proceedings before the Court and where, despite being expressly required to do so by Rule   47 § 7 of the Rules of Court, the

    On that same day a criminal investigation into the cross-border incident was launched, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Armenian Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter “the

proceedings have been instituted and thereafter, they must inquire diligently into all the details of the case, meticulously abide by all the relevant rules of procedure and must urge their clients to do the same

(iv)     Substantially the same 20.

   it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of      the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly      settlement of the matter

On the same date she also examined the applicant’s request on the merits and rejected it as unsubstantiated.

The request was refused by the Danish authorities, on 23   April 2015, for the same reasons as given in the refusal of 18   December   2008. 14.

The same applies if important new developments have occurred during the proceedings before the Court and where, despite being expressly required to do so by Rule   47   §   7 (former Rule

On the same date the applicant was questioned as a witness.

) (a) of the Act on Disciplinary Liability of Judges – “gross and/or multiple violation of law” – and imposed upon them the sanction of dismissal from office, as provided for by Section 4 (1) of the same

    On 19 October 2004, under the provisions of Article 29 § 3, the Chamber had decided to examine the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.