It held, by six votes to one, that a finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage.

Jean-Yves X..., demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 5 mars 1998 par la cour d'appel de Dijon (1re chambre, 2e section), au profit de la société KS Finans, dont le siège est Ny Verstergrade

The applicant in this case lived as a woman and would only wish to marry a man.

COUR D'APPEL D'AIX EN PROVENCE 15e Chambre A ARRÊT AU FOND DU 16 MARS 2012 N° 2012/168 Rôle N° 10/22643 SOCIETE FININ LIMITED C/ [L] [S] divorcée [R] CAISSE DU CREDIT

The Constitutional Court did not reach a finding regarding the substantive aspect of the applicant’s complaint.

    On 15 March 1990 the applicant petitioned the Naples District Court for judicial separation from his wife, Mrs R.

That court acquitted them in 1991, finding that they had not acted as de iure or de facto managers.

On 15 March 2016 the Zyuzinskiy District Court rejected the applicants’ claims as unsubstantiated.

On 29 March 2012 the Central Office of the Fund, relying on the expert reports, dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

following a judgment delivered by the European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) finding a violation of Article   6 §   1 (see Moreira Ferreira v.

This ruling was upheld by the High Court of Cassation and Justice in March 2003 (“the outstanding judgment”).

de travaux publics passé entre l'association foncière et les entreprises adjudicataires ; que l'acte par lequel le maître de l'ouvrage prononce la réception des ouvrages faisant l'objet du marché n'est

The presiding judge set the first hearing, upon a recommendation of the President of the Division, for 8 March 2006.

Between February and March 2009 it was moderated by A.J. 2.

Giurgiu, a lawyer practising in Baia Mare; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

tard et le solde à réception de l'avion ; qu'aux termes de l'article II-2 du contrat, le délai de livraison, prévu pour un contrat "finalisé" avant la fin du mois de janvier 1997, était estimé à fin mars

On 28 March 2008 the Oktyabrskiy District Court quashed the investigator’s decision of 13 March 2008, finding that the inquiry had been incomplete.

Accordingly, fining him was contrary to the principle of legal certainty. He invokes Article 6   §   1 of the Convention.

2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 16489/20 Petar MILOVANOVIĆ and Janko JAKOVLJEVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 12 March 2020 communicated on 10 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application