He did not respond. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 21 .

    The applicant was born in 1940 and lives in Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d’Or. 6.

By a letter dated 20   October 2017 the applicant informed the Court that he ‒ likewise ‒ did not have the book in his possession since there had been an order for copies of the book to be seized

In the case of Diri v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mrs   F. Tulkens, President,   Mr   A.B.

The report drawn up by a doctor indicated that the applicant did not bear any signs of ill-treatment. 8.

E.E. added that he would definitely be able to recognise that officer. 19.

As the judicial liquidator did not reply to that request, on 1 July 2015, 21 April 2016 and 13   June 2016 the court insisted that he do so. 31 .

Having regard to the duration of the treatment, the court decided that the act did not amount to torture, since it had not been systematic.

    The Government did not challenge the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment. 17.

However, the Congregation did not take any steps to submit to the authority of the CMB.

    The Government did not submit observations on the merits of the case. 36.

Moreover, the Government did not submit a single example of a domestic decision in which such a course of action had been successful (compare Emin Huseynov v.

Didier-Courbin , Deputy Director responsible for     disabled persons, General Social Action     Department, Ministry of Health, Mrs   J.

    The Government did not make any comments about the substantive aspect of Article 3 of the Convention. 47.

    In 1995, by means of the Dini reform, Italy changed its pension system from a retributive one, which applied the remuneration-based (“ retributivo ”) method of calculation, to a contributory

    Mr Centamore did not appeal, deeming it futile in the circumstances of the case. 6.     Mr Maccarinelli 33.

Nor did it pursue its complaint when it requested the Court of Cassation to rectify its previous judgment. 41.

    In their observations the Government did not challenge the allegations as presented by the applicants.

The French Federation of Paris General Practitioners did likewise on 20 March 1989.