CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179760
7 décembre 2017
Currently the criminality of the acts encompassed by Article 184 is in fact contained, depending on the method of misappropriation, in the relevant provisions concerning crimes against property.
Page 4 sur 217
JEX
69d56f4ecdc6046d477250a6
7 avril 2026
ARCHITECH domiciliée Rue de la Chapelle - Résidence Beau Rivage - Les Lecques - 83270 SAINT-CYR-SUR-MER Représentée par Me François DEFENDINI, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE, Me Pierre LE GOFF avocat
69d56f51cdc6046d477250c6
ARCHIREAL domiciliée Rue de la Chapelle - Résidence Beau Rivage - Les Lecques - 83270 SAINT-CYR-SUR-MER Représentée par Me François DEFENDINI, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE, Me Pierre LE GOFF , avocat
Juge des référés
ORCA_24MA02676_20241213
13 décembre 2024
doute quant à l'autorité compétente concernant le plan local d'urbanisme de Saint-Pons ; Par un mémoire enregistré le 15 novembre 2024, l'association de défense du Riou Bourdoux, représentée par Me Defendini
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC008327517
3 septembre 2019
the lawyer that he should forward the applicant’s bank account to the Government Agent to enable payment and that, despite those clear instructions, his lawyer unilaterally contacted the Government demanding
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6197
23 novembre 1999
To the extent that it acted in its own name, the property administration committee was defending collective interests and was therefore distinguishable from the “groups of people” having a common interest
ECLI:CEDH:002-6458
25 septembre 2012
Two sets of proceedings had been brought against the applicant union for defending teaching in the “mother tongue”. The first proceedings were discontinued.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1061
16 mars 2010
Where an agreement was in place, the flow of funds could differ depending on the level of each country’s benefits and the number of people going in each direction.
ECLI:CEDH:001-218388
13 juin 2022
He repeatedly expressed solidarity with judges intimidated for defending the rule of law and signed petitions calling on the Government to implement the rulings of the CJEU concerning the independence
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118284
7 mars 2013
She was reprimanded for failing to respect the company’s regulations, under which she was obliged to respect her employer’s good name and the reprimand was to be kept on her record for up to a year, depending
ECLI:CEDH:002-1746
15 janvier 2009
The public prosecutor summoned the first and second applicants and the author to appear before a criminal court to answer charges of publicly defending war crimes in the case of the first applicant, and
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003878497
26 février 2002
The petition asserted that it was unlikely that the defending officer understood that the applicant might have had a defence on the basis of duress and that the defending officer had indicated that he
SALON D'HONNEUR
69bf656acdc6046d47818810
16 octobre 2025
CO.KG Société de droit allemand [Adresse 1] ALLEMAGNE (Avocat constitué : Maître Marine DA CUNHA, membre de l'AARPI AUDAX AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de Marseille) (Avocat plaidant : Maître Claire DERRENDINGER
9ème Chambre JEX
669021c2766d1156dbbece31
11 juillet 2024
COUR D’APPEL D’AIX-EN-PROVENCE TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE MARSEILLE JUGE DE L’EXECUTION DOSSIER : N° RG 24/06200 - N° Portalis DBW3-W-B7I-44OW MINUTE N° : 24/ Copie exécutoire délivrée le à Me DEFENDINI
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2603051-2832357
In June 2001 the Paris public prosecutor summoned Olivier Orban, Xavier de Bartillat and General Aussaresses to appear before the Paris Criminal Court to answer charges of publicly defending war
ECLI:CEDH:001-157738
7 septembre 2015
They continued demanding the applicant to confess to his involvement in criminal activity. As the applicant protested, they put him on a chair and V. kicked him with his leg in the chest.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3448
30 mars 2006
Turkey - 32458/96 Judgment 30.3.2006 [Section I] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Conviction for contempt of court of an accused for the terms of his pleadings while defending himself: violation
ECLI:CEDH:002-13975
20 décembre 2022
In particular, the impugned provision prescribed, depending on the rate of new Covid-19 infections calculated on the basis of the previous seven days (so-called seven-day incident rate) in the district
ECLI:CEDH:001-142662
6 mars 2014
the final judgment (striking-out) transmitted by the Court to the Committee in the above case and to the sums allocated for costs and expenses; Having examined the information provided by the defending
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC001121503
19 juin 2007
of the Regional Court quashed the judgment of 7 June 1999 following a protest instituted by the Deputy President of the Supreme Court and remitted the case for a fresh consideration, demanding