Christian ... 66000 PERPIGNAN représentée par la SCP SALVIGNOL-GUILHEM, avoués à la Cour ORDONNANCE DE CLOTURE DU 22 Novembre 2007 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 27 NOVEMBRE

Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, §§   111 and 124-125, ECHR 2011 (refusal of alternative civilian service to Jehovah’s Witnesses) 7,500     16647/19 14/03/2019 BIBLEYSKIY TSENTR POSOLSTVO IISUSA

Jean- Marc ARMINGAUD, Conseiller Mme Gisèle BRESDIN, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

Who will rejoice in the deaths of millions of Christians? While using as an instrument supposed other ‘Christians’ – pawns from the same countries in which the action is taking place?

    As to the proportionality of the interference, the Court notes that the amount of the excise duty that the applicant was ordered to pay was not in itself exorbitant (see Christian Religious

Jean-Marc ARMINGAUD, Conseiller Mme Gisèle BRESDIN, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré. Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Myriam RUBINI X... : - CONTRADICTOIRE. - prononcé publiquement par M.

, and the rising tension between the Shabak and the Christian minorities in Ninewa.

They further maintained that several converted Christians in Iran had been arrested and subjected to ill-treatment.

    The case concerns an administrative sanction imposed on the applicant, a Baptist Christian, for holding Bible meetings in his home without notifying the authorities. THE FACTS 2.

Armenia , no.   32283/04, § 76, 17 June 2008).

Who will rejoice in the deaths of millions of Christians? While using as an instrument supposed other ‘Christians’ – pawns from the same countries in which the action is taking place?

Armenia , no. 6562/03, § 37, 11   January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia , no.   26986/03, §§   100 ‑ 102, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia , no.

  Armenia , no.   26986/03, §§   95-96, 15   November 2007; Ezelin v. France , judgment of 26 April 1991, Series   A no.   202, §§ 35, 37, and Pendragon v.

Armenia , no.   26986/03, §§ 116-117, 15 November 2007, and Bukta and Others v.   Hungary , no. 25691/04, § 37, ECHR 2007 ‑ III). 30.

This is what happens in the largest group of States: Andorra, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, Spain, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Romania

Armenia (dec.), no. 73601/14, § 53, 29 September 2020). 47.

lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Swiss nationals, Ms Annick Marcelle Belli and Ms Christiane

The burden of proving the violent intentions of the organisers of a demonstration lies with the authorities (see Christian Democratic People’s Party v.

Having been expelled from Turkey and banned by the Ministry of the Interior from re-entering the country on account of statements on Kurdish and Armenian issues considered “separatist”, which she made