CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310JUD004132617
10 mars 2022
On 9 February 2018 the applicant’s wife applied for asylum on his behalf. 57.
Page 39 sur 606
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD005427300
2 août 2001
According to his wife, he was living in Italy where he had social contacts, for which reason the applicant and his wife could be expected to lead their family life in Italy.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2025:87
13 février 2025
#Žalba – Državne potpore – Sektor zračnog prijevoza – Mjere koje je Međunarodna zračna luka Temišvar (Rumunjska) uvela u korist Wizz Aira i drugih zračnih prijevoznika koji se njome koriste – Odluka kojom
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC004559908
17 septembre 2013
In support of her explanations Ms Todorović submitted written statements signed by the wives of Mr Milomir Šejić, Mr Petar Perović and Mr Borivoje Đurašević in which they confirmed her assertions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0425JUD003657897
25 avril 2000
Our records show that your late wife entered National Insurance on 11 July 1976 and the start of her working life for National Insurance purposes was 6 April 1976.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0919DEC006053400
19 septembre 2002
On 25 October 1992, the applicant and his wife (hereafter Ms W.) divorced before the Groß Gerau District Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503DEC004126617
3 mai 2022
colony 53067/17 15/07/2017 Shamil Magomedovich SIDIKBEGOV 1979 IK-17 Krasnoyarsk Region mother, wife
3ème Chambre Commerciale
67061e64fde28ee420711410
8 octobre 2024
Ces deux lots appartenant à la société The Wine Factory (TWF) étaient destinés à deux clients, basés en Chine mais sur deux ports différents, [Localité 4] et [Localité 5].
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0907DEC002151893
7 septembre 1993
On 16 December 1985 the applicant brought an action against his ex-wife claiming re-payment of AS 55,000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002088309
13 décembre 2011
or the wife of M.G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005490913
19 septembre 2017
The court thus declared that the applicant and his wife were not acquirers of the property in good faith. 14.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 5
5fdb5341c770b63125831055
21 mars 2019
Elle ajoute que la dénomination de la société Bordeaux Wine Logistic est identique à la marque déposée par M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519DEC002295811
19 mai 2015
The applicant and his wife started exercising joint and indivisible parental authority over their daughter, in accordance with the Swiss family law. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC005526400
14 décembre 2000
Events of and following 29 September 1998 On 29 September 1998 the applicant got involved in a domestic dispute between his wife and stepdaughter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620DEC006710001
20 juin 2006
10 September 2002, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS The applicants are all male British nationals whose wives
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2547
30 août 2007
possession: no violation Facts : The second applicant company was the registered owner of a plot of 23 hectares of agricultural land with development potential that was occupied by a farmer and his wife
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1104DEC004866699
4 novembre 2003
The applicant’s wife was not informed of where the applicant had been taken.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD002182312
6 octobre 2015
The Court notes at the outset that the applicant and his wife separated in 2007, when their son M. was three years old. The applicant’s wife moved with the child to another town.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314
12 mars 2015
The applicant did so on 29 May 2013; his wife made further comments on 1 July 2013. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD001156205
27 juin 2006
He had obtained evidence from the medical staff involved in the treatment of the applicant’s wife.