CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310JUD004132617

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2022

10 mars 2022

    On 9 February 2018 the applicant’s wife applied for asylum on his behalf. 57.

Source officielle

Page 39 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD005427300

Admin. suprême

2 août 2001

2 août 2001

According to his wife, he was living in Italy where he had social contacts, for which reason the applicant and his wife could be expected to lead their family life in Italy.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2025:87

CJUE

13 février 2025

13 février 2025

#Žalba – Državne potpore – Sektor zračnog prijevoza – Mjere koje je Međunarodna zračna luka Temišvar (Rumunjska) uvela u korist Wizz Aira i drugih zračnih prijevoznika koji se njome koriste – Odluka kojom

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC004559908

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

In support of her explanations Ms Todorović submitted written statements signed by the wives of Mr Milomir Šejić, Mr Petar Perović and Mr Borivoje Đurašević in which they confirmed her assertions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0425JUD003657897

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2000

25 avril 2000

Our records show that your late wife entered National Insurance on 11 July 1976 and the start of her working life for National Insurance purposes was 6 April 1976.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0919DEC006053400

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2002

19 septembre 2002

  On 25 October 1992, the applicant and his wife (hereafter Ms W.) divorced before the Groß Gerau District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503DEC004126617

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

colony                    53067/17 15/07/2017 Shamil Magomedovich SIDIKBEGOV 1979 IK-17 Krasnoyarsk Region mother, wife

Source officielle
CA

3ème Chambre Commerciale

67061e64fde28ee420711410

Appel

8 octobre 2024

8 octobre 2024

Ces deux lots appartenant à la société The Wine Factory (TWF) étaient destinés à deux clients, basés en Chine mais sur deux ports différents, [Localité 4] et [Localité 5].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0907DEC002151893

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1993

7 septembre 1993

        On 16 December 1985 the applicant brought an action against his ex-wife claiming re-payment of AS 55,000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002088309

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

or the wife of M.G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC005490913

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

The court thus declared that the applicant and his wife were not acquirers of the property in good faith. 14.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 5

5fdb5341c770b63125831055

Appel

21 mars 2019

21 mars 2019

Elle ajoute que la dénomination de la société Bordeaux Wine Logistic est identique à la marque déposée par M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519DEC002295811

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2015

19 mai 2015

The applicant and his wife started exercising joint and indivisible parental authority over their daughter, in accordance with the Swiss family law. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC005526400

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

    Events of and following 29 September 1998 On 29 September 1998 the applicant got involved in a domestic dispute between his wife and stepdaughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620DEC006710001

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2006

20 juin 2006

10   September 2002, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS The applicants are all male British nationals whose wives

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2547

Admin. suprême

30 août 2007

30 août 2007

possession: no violation   Facts : The second applicant company was the registered owner of a plot of 23 hectares of agricultural land with development potential that was occupied by a farmer and his wife

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1104DEC004866699

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2003

4 novembre 2003

The applicant’s wife was not informed of where the applicant had been taken.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD002182312

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

    The Court notes at the outset that the applicant and his wife separated in 2007, when their son M. was three years old. The applicant’s wife moved with the child to another town.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2015

12 mars 2015

The applicant did so on 29 May 2013; his wife made further comments on 1   July 2013. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD001156205

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

He had obtained evidence from the medical staff involved in the treatment of the applicant’s wife.

Source officielle