CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC004647799
7 juin 2001
the conclusion that the authorities failed to do what they reasonably could given their state of knowledge at the time.
Page 39 sur 194
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518DEC007271301
18 mai 2004
And what country-wide insanity that was ... At the beginning it was bizarre and then funny.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD007594711
30 mai 2017
The same “original” copies indicated that SR had obtained 10,031 votes, while the official result was only 4,538 votes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1221JUD003329096
21 décembre 1999
She has been registered with the State agency for employment and vocational training since 17 February 1994. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD001662905
9 avril 2009
After that a group of about five men in white camouflage cloaks and masks had broken into the house.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD001722113
2 octobre 2018
This does not mean that the supervision is limited to ascertaining whether the respondent State exercised its discretion reasonably, carefully and in good faith; what the Court has to do is to look at
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1129DEC004022820
29 novembre 2022
He reiterated what his son had allegedly told him, namely that one day during the 2016 winter holidays, while the applicant and his cousin, E., were listening to music on headphones, T.R., who had been
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0406DEC000313467
6 avril 1968
After the applicants' lawyer had submitted to the Commission a statement setting out their complaints in the following terms: "While serving his sentence, the applicant was required to perform
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0713JUD000184908
13 juillet 2017
State and municipal liability for damages 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206JUD000696213
6 décembre 2016
However, since one of the lay judges changed during the proceedings, the trial had to start afresh.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6320
27 septembre 2001
Government’s preliminary objections – (a) (competence ratione temporis ): the question whether, and if so to what extent, the Court could take account of events that had occurred before 11 September 1997
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2970712-3271598
17 décembre 2009
They lived in a room in a State-owned hostel in Sumgayit up until 2003 when they discovered that three rooms nearby, which belonged to the local army recruitment office, were vacant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202DEC001444809
2 février 2010
The Court reiterates that time starts to run on the date following the date on which the final decision has been pronounced orally in public, or on which the applicant or his representative was informed
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD005725814
17 janvier 2019
must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0919JUD002115518
19 septembre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD004847913
26 juillet 2018
must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD000368620
10 décembre 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD006399719
21 janvier 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD002219520
11 mars 2021
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186582
7 septembre 2018
It specified that the recovery of the child maintenance from the applicant should start on the date of S.’s transfer to public care.