CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

21 659 résultats pour « Neguede »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC001787306

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

The lawyer asserted that the applicant needed to undergo important medical treatment which was not available in detention facility.

Source officielle

Page 39 sur 1083

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142472

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2014

18 mars 2014

On 13 May 2008 Teghout CJSC lodged a claim against the applicant seeking to oblige him to sign the agreement on taking of his property for State needs.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1456831-1526823

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2005

29 septembre 2005

A local court ordered the prison to review the need for continuing the special regime at regular intervals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1988

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

When – as in the applicant’s case – freedom of expression was exercised as political speech, limitations were only justified if there was a clear, pressing and specific social need.

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:2011:124

droit européen

24 mars 2011

24 mars 2011

request - Period allowed for bringing proceedings - Manifestly inadmissible - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD001614015

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2022

19 mai 2022

    They argued that they had purchased their respective flats for the purpose of resolving their housing needs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD002347615

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

A.: So, you need the money for the trip? I.: Yes, I need it for the trip. Ch.: We need you to show where he spends his time.... I.: Well, not to show, just say where.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127571

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2013

26 septembre 2013

Date of decision BUTUC, application No. 6899/03 16/10/2012 POPESCU Viorel Alexandru, application Nos. 34745/04 + 11/12/2012 RAILEANU, application No. 6845/05 25/09/2012 NEGREA, application No. 15960/05

Source officielle
TCOM

Audience publique de vacation

69d4f6decdc6046d4765d76f

Commerce

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

[P] [U] [C] demeurant [Adresse 3], absents, comparant par Me Marie Negrel, substituée par Me Antonin Fragne, avocats (K0006).

Source officielle
TJ

J.L.D.

65849124e41137cbf9fc8330

T. Judiciaire

21 décembre 2023

21 décembre 2023

Egyptienne, demeurant 64 avenue de la République 93300 AUBERVILLIERS Après l'avoir avisé de son droit de choisir un avocat ou d'en demander un qui lui sera désigné d'office, en présence de Maître François NEGREL

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0509DEC001265187

Admin. suprême

9 mai 1989

9 mai 1989

  They give priority to their own needs rather than to those of the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD004104011

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

He refused to do so because he considered that he did not need one. The applicant and the escorting police officers left the applicant’s workplace at 8.40 a.m. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD001912913

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2016

11 octobre 2016

Stated that he supressed the need for psychiatric care with willpower ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0519DEC002363494

Admin. suprême

19 mai 1994

19 mai 1994

A.V. further confirmed that the applicant was awaiting examination at the University Hospital of Helsinki in order to have his need for an operation determined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC007219310

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

The Government further submitted that the need for the applicant’s continued confinement had been verified and confirmed by the relevant court at regular intervals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122DEC000633402

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2005

22 novembre 2005

Therefore, she needed somebody to provide care to herself and her two young children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174297

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2017

17 mai 2017

application concerns the applicant company’s lack of access to a court in proceedings by which it sought to challenge the Croatian Chamber of Commerce’s refusal to confirm its itinerary schedule, which needed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188466

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2018

19 novembre 2018

The Croatian army was obliged to return the vehicles once it no longer needed them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0614JUD006794713

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2018

14 juin 2018

Full dependence on inmates’ assistance; sanitary facilities are not adapted for the needs of wheelchair users; the detention facility lacked wheelchair ramps.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2016:162

CJUE

10 mars 2016

10 mars 2016

— Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China — Provisional anti-dumping duty — Definitive anti-dumping duty — No need

Source officielle