CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1415580-1504930
6 septembre 2005
Therefore the Court held by six votes to one that there had been no violation of Article 8.
Page 39 sur 1190
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC005359499
7 novembre 2000
In other words, Tasos Papadopoulos, because he is the one we call ‘Kirycas’, puts forward his name to head the DIKO’s ballot.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD003867608
27 novembre 2012
The authorities held that any demonstration held in Taksim on 1 May 2008 would be unlawful and unconstitutional on account of possible provocations and disruption of traffic and public order.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-891094-915712
11 décembre 2003
The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1726449-1819787
13 juillet 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8. The Court further held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0208DEC000292802
8 février 2007
This sum, which is to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144545
6 mai 2014
Moreover, the Court of Appeal had held that the procedure adopted was compatible with Article 6 § 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD007386401
11 octobre 2005
Under the head of non-pecuniary damage he did not claim any particular sum.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD001583813
17 janvier 2017
Thereupon, the Wels Regional Court held a first hearing on 25 March 2003. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322JUD005203999
22 mars 2005
At the hearing held on 15 October 1993 the court summoned the applicant to submit documents that could be of relevance to that opinion. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1221JUD004521199
21 décembre 2004
Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI). 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0715JUD004467198
15 juillet 2003
back of S.S.' head as he lay on the floor.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD004578305
21 octobre 2010
It is also noted that the applicant had requested that the hearing be held in his presence (see paragraph 12 above). 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD004668606
4 avril 2017
On 24 April 2002 the Town Court allowed the applicant’s claim for index-linking of the award of 28 October 1999 and held that the coal mine should pay him EUR 912 under this head. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC007800501
9 septembre 2008
Conclusion Mr Sidorov suffers from an organic lesion of the brain with marked mental change, epileptiform paroxysm, psychosis excluding responsibility...
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1457
25 juin 2009
Subsequently, another assailant, B.B., hit the applicant on the head with a wooden plank.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD003352608
13 juillet 2010
Mazlum-Der reported that other persons held in the Centre maintained that they did not know that the applicant had been held in the Centre for a very long time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416DEC003903097
16 avril 2002
Fiona had been killed by a client, D, who hit her head repeatedly on the floor. D was arrested on 23 December 1993.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155112
11 mai 2015
This decision was upheld on appeal by the Osijek County Court ( Županijski sud u Osijeku ) on 22 March 2013.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0210JUD001517589
10 février 1995
He had passed on the borrowed sum to the applicant, who was responsible for repaying the loan. 9.