UKRAINE (Application no. 25531/12)     JUDGMENT   Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Fair hearing and adversarial trial • Requalification of the applicant’s claim by the Court of Appeal • No clear reasons

    The applicant complained principally that his right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of his requests to appear in court.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

decision concerning the security measures imposed on the applicant; violation of the presumption of innocence; breach of the right of access to court on the grounds that the Supreme Court had not held a hearing

    The applicant and his court-appointed defence counsel appeared at the cassation hearing on 28 March 2019 in the Supreme Court.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

reconstructed and included the following items: (i)     the bill of indictment dated 27 May 2004, which was certified as a true copy of the original, (ii)     copies of the records of the hearings

    The applicant alleged that the proceedings under the Spanish judicial system had violated her right to a fair and public hearing as guaranteed by Article 6 §   1 of the Convention.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

The 1947 decision had not been raised with the parties in the course of the hearing and the parties had not received an opportunity to comment on it. 9.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

The applicant company maintained that it had submitted the relevant documents during the hearing.

    At the hearings held on 22 and 23 October and 18 December 2009, and on 26 April 2010, the applicant was served with transcripts of CD audio recordings made during the secret surveillance,

The court could not adjourn the hearing proprio motu save on special grounds.

A hearing took place on this point on 22 July 1997 following which the Attorney General was given leave to appear and address the Supreme Court at the appeal hearing. 20.

Pleadings are exchanged and formally submitted to the court during a hearing.

.) - 54984/09 Decision 4.6.2013 [Section V] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Communication of reporting judge’s draft decision to public rapporteur in proceedings before

severance pay ( otpremnina ), the vacation pay ( regres ) for 2011 and 2012, the per diem for food ( topli obrok ) for January, February, March, April and June 2012, the allowance for conserved food and heating

to attend, sent S. to the court with a request to adjourn the hearing.