Family Code Article 7 General principles of regulation of family relations “5.

Article   8 was thus applicable in its “family life” aspect.

14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Procedural aspect)

Article XXIV (1) Everyone shall have the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the authorities.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family

He had twice been invited to discuss a proposal for resettlement of his family to another part of the village but no response had been received. 18.

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family

Law – Article 14 in conjunction with Article   8: The decision to deprive the applicant of access rights in respect of his son had constituted an interference with his right to respect for family

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage

However, it is an essential part of a prisoner’s right to respect for family life that the authorities enable him or, if need be, assist him in maintaining contact with his close family (see, among many

    An interference with a prisoner’s right to respect for his family life does not need to amount to an outright ban on family visits (see, for example, Andrey Smirnov v.

In 2014 he also applied for a new long-term residence permit for family purposes.

    After interviewing the applicant about his business activities and the place of residence of his family members, but not about any other issues relating to his family life, on 5 March 2012

    Following the enactment of Article 187 of the Civil Code, three Family Courts raised an objection with the Constitutional Court, arguing that the provision was unconstitutional.

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family