Of the seven hearings listed between 3 September 1998 and 6 July 1999, two hearings were adjourned because the defendant did not attend and five hearings were adjourned because the judge

Three hearings listed for 7 and 21 May and 4 June 2002 did not take place because the Customs Agency had not been duly summoned.

s state of health because he was a commander of a military unit. B.

He now affirms that, because of the hot weather on the day in question he did not feel well and had to go to the lavatory.

    From 28 April 1998 to 17 February 1999 several hearings were adjourned either because the defendant had not attended or because the judge was busy on another case. 8.

He then noted the applicant’s circumstances, namely that he had been prevented from marrying his partner because same-sex marriage was not recognised in domestic law at the time his partner passed away

functioning of KD Kostrena goes beyond the current political crisis in Kostrena and the public statements of Mirela Marunić. ‘ The fact is that we had even earlier objected to Mirela Marunić’s work because

As to its right of access to court it claims that it was just formal because there is no possibility for the applicant company to have its civil claim decided on the merits.

    In the course of the proceedings sixteen hearings were adjourned, out of which three times because of the applicant’s failure to attend the hearings, once because of the failure of the respondent

Proceedings had to be adjourned because at one occasion a witness and at another occasion a party did not appear and because of the judge’s sickness on two occasions.

Five were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings and because he was ill. A further six were adjourned owing to the absence of one or more of the parties. 15.

The complaint was manifestly ill-founded in respect of two thirds of the award, because this part had been enforced quickly.

It dismissed the claim against Kh for the reimbursement of the reconstruction costs because Kh had never authorised these works on his premises.

He also claims that the acts of violence were committed because of his Serbian origin. THE LAW 1.

the Court had already rejected a similar claim on 8 October 1979, and insofar as he claimed promotion as from 1 July 1985 because, inter alia, it could not yet be assumed that the Governor had refused

The payment of 19 March 2007 cannot be considered as redress, because it was unintentional. 14.

The applicant responds that he had not claimed the benefits earlier because no such benefits existed for men and because the scheme itself was unlawful and discriminatory. 3.

On 15 April and 23 May 2000 the examination of the case was adjourned because of the parties’ failure to appear.

According to the decision of the appeal court, the hearing was adjourned because the applicant wished to read the case file and to conclude an agreement with another lawyer.