The judgment was not appealed against and became final. 12.     The judgment could not be enforced because the defendant had insufficient funds. B.

This is because, according to well-established case-law, if damage has been caused by a criminal offence but no criminal proceedings have been instituted or concluded against the perpetrator because of

   In 1980 he joined the British army and became a member of the Scots Guards.

The accompanying letter stated that the examination had not been performed because the applicant had twice failed to appear (on 14   November and 5 December 2006).

He maintained that he had only agreed to assist “Timagin” in acquiring drugs because he had believed that he was an occasional “ecstasy” user, like himself.

He had not seen how and what key had been used to open the door of the cellar because he had been, at that time, in the police car.

That decision became final on 6 June 2012. As a result thereof, the writ of execution of 18 February 2003 (see paragraph 13 above) also became final on the same day. 33.

    On an unspecified date, the applicant became aware that the evidence extracted from the body of his son had been lost. 30.

We find that it is more problematic than usual for the mother to have supervised contact sessions because of her cognitive issues, because from time to time [( fra gang til gang )] she does not know what

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,  

Some of the scheduled hearings were adjourned because the court bailiff was unable to serve summonses on the applicant.

He was given food only once during that period but was anyway unable to eat it because of his handcuffs. 27.

concerning those applications (see paragraphs 25-27 below), or because one of his lawyers could not attend a court hearing.

There was no need for them to apply force [by then], because [V.K.] had already been apprehended [by Da. and Ko.] and was unable to escape.

He explained that he had not raised any such complaints during the preliminary investigation out of fear for his safety, because he had received threats from police officers. 38.

The hearing on 1 February 2005 was rescheduled because the applicant’s lawyer did not attend. 17.

    On 18 August 2010 the Supreme Court decided not to examine the appeals lodged by N.’s and V.’s counsel, and the lower courts’ judgments became final. II.

When he came in to say that C would not be attending any more because she was in Yugoslavia, no one imagined that she was lying at home injured.” 16.

The police officers could not see the faces of the drivers or passengers because of the tinted windows, but they wrote down the numbers of the passes for both vehicles.