The applicant company complained under Article 10 of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.     The applicant company is a limited liability company with its registered office in Berlin.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 57.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 10 DE LA CONVENTION 42.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 41.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT         ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

Parikaki, a lawyer practising in Chios; the decision to give notice of the complaint under Article 10 of the Convention to the Greek Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent’s delegate

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 12.

    There has therefore been a breach of Article 10 of the Convention in relation to each of the two applicants. 67 .

Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression-{général} (Article 10-1 - Liberté de communiquer des informations;Liberté de recevoir des informations);Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 35.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   10 OF THE CONVENTION 19.

The rights guaranteed by Articles 8 and 10 had to be balanced against each other, any restriction of those rights had to be subjected to very close scrutiny and neither Article 8 nor Article 10 had any

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 49.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   10 OF THE CONVENTION 35.

    ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 69.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 39.

      ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION read alone and in conjunction with article 14 of the convention 62.

Hongrie - 64520/10 Arrêt 3.12.2013 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Liberté d'expression Historien et maison d’édition condamnés à verser des dommages-intérêts à un haut fonctionnaire pour avoir allégué

6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) and Article 10 of the Convention, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the decision not to have the applicant’s name disclosed; the parties’ observations; Having