CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC004166198
27 juin 2002
peace...; and no such order shall be made unless the justice ... is satisfied that (a) that there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion mentioned in subsection (1) above; and (b) that
Page 38 sur 126
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD000160602
23 avril 2009
The applicants stated that they had permanent places of residence; that they had the necessary communication equipment to ensure constant contact with the authorities; that they had always been given positive
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC006300112
21 novembre 2017
The prosecutor also stated in the decision that there was no evidence showing that the deceased might have been killed. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD004960808
27 septembre 2011
They submitted that such a remedy was not only sufficiently certain in theory and practice but was also effective and accessible. 31.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160664
11 janvier 2016
They added that the Maribor Military Court’ judgment had unequivocally stated that their legal predecessor had been the owner of the property in question on 17 August 1945.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD004278506
16 juillet 2009
It further considered that there was a risk that he would obstruct the proper conduct of the investigation. The court also stressed the likelihood that a heavy penalty would be imposed on him. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC003161196
30 novembre 2000
is to say intentionally imputing an offence on T. whilst knowing that he had not committed it (rather than voicing a mere suspicion that he had).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607JUD000027705
7 juin 2011
had been so protracted that they were rendered devoid of purpose. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC005296211
30 août 2016
In the application he alleged that there had been a violation of his rights under Article 11 of the Convention. 18 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0316DEC004510098
16 mars 2004
The court noted that the applicant had a permanent residence and family, that he had received positive references at his former place of work, that he had no criminal record and that there were no indications
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD004704506
15 septembre 2009
By a letter dated 13 April 2000, Mr and Mrs P. informed the applicant that they were not seeking renewal of the contract but that they were availing themselves of the right granted to them
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC002369502
25 août 2005
Further, there is no suggestion that pressure is actually put on district or circuit judges to decide cases one way rather than another.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923JUD002445304
23 septembre 2014
She submitted that she had been told that there had been no need to perform an overly detailed examination, as it could be easily seen that the bridges should not be worn. 16.
10ème et 9ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000024755420
2 novembre 2011
Thierry Carriol, chargé des fonctions de Maître des Requêtes, - les observations de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler, avocat de M. et Mme A, - les conclusions de Mme Delphine Hedary, rapporteur public ; La parole
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC002099813
27 janvier 2015
This precedent confirmed that there existed an effective remedy before the relevant authority for excessive length.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC004794099
13 mai 2003
He also complains under Article 13 about the absence of an effective remedy in that his allegations were examined only by the prosecution authorities rather than by an independent tribunal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC002745109
23 septembre 2010
That rule is based on the assumption, reflected in Article 13 of the Convention – with which it has close affinity – that there is an effective remedy available in respect of the alleged breach in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD003394603
21 juillet 2009
They submitted that the president of the court’s reply of 23 March 2007 meant that the supervisory appeal had been upheld.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD002775605
2 décembre 2014
It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B. Merits 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002564294
29 avril 1999
It follows that there has been a breach of that provision. 55.