cases of international child abduction in 33 cases the mediation resulted in an agreement as a final solution of the case (9 cases) or a voluntary return of a child (12 cases) or a withdrawal of a motion

On 21 March 2012 the applicant filed a motion of private prosecution against the police officers involved. On 28 November 2012 the Eger High Court acquitted the officers.

On 11 April 1994 the Gödöllő District Court dismissed the applicant’s motion for bias.

The treatment was cut short in May 2016, when the applicant was ordered by the Warsaw District Court to undergo a psychiatric observation in a hospital and that court refused the applicant’s lawyer’s motion

Par des mémoires en défense enregistrés les 24 juillet 2025 et 30 octobre 2025, la communauté d'agglomération Thonon Agglomération, représentée par Me Mollion, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que

Seule est produite une motion présentée le 25 novembre 2003 au CHSCT par les représentants du personnel CGT et SUD ainsi libellée : « alerté par les témoignages, nombreux et concordants, d'agents du centre

mémoires en défense, enregistrés le 16 mars 2022 et le 18 se tembre 2025, ce dernier mémoire n’ayant as été communiqué, la commune des Adrets, re résentée ar la Selarl Conseil Affaires ubliques (Me Mollion

Me Mollion a communiqué au greffe, pour le compte de M. E D, des pièces enregistrées le 22 mars 2022.

treatment Conditions of detention and lack of medical assistance: violations   Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Court’s refusal to hear defence witnesses despite earlier granting of motions

On 18 February 1996 the applicant’s motion for a full exemption from court fees was dismissed.

On 22 May 2001 the applicant’s defence counsel announced that he would submit observations on the Public Prosecutor’s Office’s motions.

It appears that the motions were presented at the hearings by the investigators dealing with the case, in the first applicant’s case this being investigator A.H.

    Sections 8, 9 and 11 define the motion for a deadline and provide for measures that may be applied by the court dealing with the motion.

On 25 June 2000 the first applicant lodged a further motion for bias against the District Court judge.

de Me PINET, avocat au barreau de VILLEFRANCHE S / S INTIMES : Monsieur Jean René Y... ... 69480 GRAVES SUR ANSE représenté par Me DE FOURCROY, avoué à la Cour assisté de Me Bernard MOMPOINT

D A et Mme E A, représentés par Me Monpion, demandent au tribunal dans le dernier état de leurs écritures : 1°) d'annuler la délibération du 8 février 2022 par laquelle le conseil municipal de Saint-Priest-Taurion

The motion for a deadline is to be dealt with by the president of the higher court. He or she is to decide on the motion for a deadline within fifteen days of receiving it. 18.

The Court also notes that by his motions of 24 April 2009 and 22   June   2009, and also by his constitutional appeal challenging the rejections of these motions, the applicant did not attempt