CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0306DEC002106308
6 mars 2018
On 17 September 2008 the Stavropol Regional Court endorsed the trial courts’ findings on appeal. COMPLAINT 13.
Page 38 sur 1230
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229667
24 novembre 2023
The applicant company received the latter judgment on 4 March 2020. The main commercial proceedings are still pending.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD001794713
1 mars 2022
The Court sees no reason to disagree with that finding.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161918
15 mars 2016
On 18 August 2009 the Ministry returned the registration documents again finding other deficiencies in the documents submitted to it.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC000552103
4 janvier 2008
2008 as a Chamber composed of: Peer Lorenzen, President, Snejana Botoucharova, Karel Jungwiert, Rait Maruste, Javier Borrego Borrego, Renate Jaeger, Mark
ECLI:CEDH:001-148786
17 novembre 2014
The judgment was therefore based on insufficient factual findings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705DEC006702101
5 juillet 2007
Baia Mare, which had become S.C. Transgold S.A. Baia Mare, had caused excessive and dangerous pollution in the city of Baia Mare.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC004724099
14 mars 2000
According to the findings of an examination of the remains, the victim had died one to two weeks prior to the finding of the remains.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD002319215
28 mai 2019
in the balance when assessing the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings and may tip the balance towards finding a violation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155136
13 mai 2015
(b) Notification of 7 March 2013 On 7 March 2013 the applicant notified the city administration of his intention to organise meetings on 22 and 23 March 2013.
ECLI:CEDH:001-205162
14 septembre 2020
On 13 March 2007, upon the applicant’s request, the Yevpatoriya court allotted the applicant’s property in kind, giving it a new address.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56309
6 janvier 2004
s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Resolution ResDH(2003)177 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 March
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520DEC005064320
20 mai 2025
Georgia ((dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, § 49, 1 March 2022), the Court noted the following: “[O]n 11 March 2020 the World Health Organisation declared a public health emergency of international concern
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD000354706
15 septembre 2016
Between 24 March and 4 August 2005 the applicant had four one ‑ hour visits from his mother and father. 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503JUD002613102
3 mai 2005
The Court notes that the decisions favourable for Mr Grishechkin were not enforced for five years (March 1999 – March 2004) and two and a half years (September 2001 – March
cr
6079a8c69ba5988459c4ee32
29 mars 2006
Anne-Marie, épouse X..., parties civiles agissant tant en leur nom personnel qu'en qualité de représentants légaux de leur fille mineure Mélody Z..., contre l'arrêt de la chambre de l'instruction
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:C200796
19 mai 2016
2007 depuis le 6 mars 2007 (audition de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0307DEC005461200
7 mars 2002
On 1 March 2001, the applicants served notice on the tenant informing her that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 15 March 2001. Pursuant to Law no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167688
20 septembre 2016
On 23 March 2006 the applicants were arrested by the police after leaving a meeting with P.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD003326803
17 juillet 2008
It sees no reasons to be depart from those findings in the present case. 48.