At its last hearing held on 22 October 2003, the Magistrates' Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because, following the promulgation of Law No. 4854 on 24 April 2003,

    The next hearing was held on 21 December 2000.

He asked for an oral hearing to be held. 14.

It appears that the tear gas caused E. physical pain but she did not suffer any injuries. 9 .

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

The Regional Court further held that the economic well-being of the country should be taken into account as well.

unanimously that Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 4, paragraph 3.d (art. 14+4-3-d), was applicable in this case;     - held by six votes to three that there had

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards him EUR 3,500 under this head. 61.

When she had refused, he had held her head tight and had forced his penis into her mouth.

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.

  Injury to the head, concussion. The patient had diffuse haematomas to the head and mainly in her hair and was complaining of headache and dizziness.

In November 1994 the Interregional Director of Customs informed him that he could recover his personal effects and that the car could be returned to him by means of a friendly settlement for the sum of

The injury was characterised by a medical expert as serious bodily injury, and the applicant sought psychological help concerning the attack.

effective, with regard to complaints concerning the death of a demonstrator from a shot fired by a police officer: inadmissible Facts – During a demonstration, a relative of the applicants sustained a head

unanimously that the injunction, either taken alone or together with the award, did not give rise to a breach of Article 10 (art. 10);     - held unanimously that Article 6, paragraph 1 (art

Thirdly, the search of the applicant’s flat on 21 May 2013 had revealed large sums in cash.

On 22 July 1997 a next hearing was held.

As for the ‘dead souls’ [falsified entries in the register of prospective party members], the Head of the Federal Registration Service, [Mr V.], intentionally held back that out of 60,000 party members

the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 14 December 1988 and by the Government of Sweden on 27 January 1989;   Whereas in its judgment of 21 February 1990 the Court:   - held