The court listed hearings for 4 and 5 May 1994.   Those hearings were subsequently cancelled because one of the applicant’s co-defendants had failed to appear.

The company’s representative attended the appeal hearing and made submissions. 10.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

    It appears from the minutes of the hearing of 3 July 2003 that the Criminal Court received the case-file in question from the Civil Court.

The relevant part of that Article reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...” Admissibility 25.

    The Sabail District Court held several hearings and scheduled the last hearing for 12 February 2013.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    On 16 May 2005 the Plovdiv District Court issued a summons, notifying the applicant of the action brought against her and the date of the first court hearing.

The company produced the file during a hearing on 10   May 2005 and the court accepted it as evidence in the case. 10.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Reasonable time)

    On 8 February 2005 the Khanty-Mansiyskiy Regional Court held a hearing which the applicant did not attend. The adverse party’s representative attended the hearing and made submissions.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

    The Court reiterates that the entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article   6   §   1 necessarily implies a right to an “oral hearing” ( see Fredin   v.

complained that the non-communication of the Chief Public Prosecutor’s written opinions during the proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court had violated his right to an adversarial and fair hearing

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)

The parties were not informed of the hearing.

complaint is to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, whose relevant part reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing