CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

750 résultats pour « Frantzen »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC000099403

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2004

25 mai 2004

Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

Page 38 sur 38

← Précédent

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0829DEC000036218

Admin. suprême

29 août 2023

29 août 2023

Italian Francesca FERRI 1976 Rome Italian Erica FINOLEZZI 1976 Rome Italian Veronica FIORI 1977 Ciampino Italian Annarita FORCIONE 1978 Rome Italian Nicola FOTI 1974 Rome Italian Immacolata Tiziana FRANZESE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD006635714

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2017

13 avril 2017

Furthermore, the inquiring judge considered that the systematic concealment of funds through fictitious payment descriptions ( causali fittizie ), the use of frontmen ( prestanome ) and of shell companies

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC002110816

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

Furthermore, the inquiring judge considered that the systematic concealment of funds through fictitious payment descriptions ( causali fittizie ), the use of frontmen ( prestanome ) and of shell companies

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC005275099

Admin. suprême

28 août 2001

28 août 2001

Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The respondent Government are represented by their Agent Mr R. Böcker, of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC000929802

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2004

25 mai 2004

Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC000870403

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0204JUD005275099

Admin. suprême

4 février 2003

4 février 2003

  Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The Netherlands Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   R.A.A.   Böcker of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD003074912

Admin. suprême

14 février 2017

14 février 2017

Franken, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The Netherlands Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A. Böcker, and their Deputy   Agent, Ms K.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0907DEC000157302

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2006

7 septembre 2006

He is represented before the Court by Böhler Franken Koppe de Feijter Advocaten, lawyers practising in the Netherlands. The respondent Government are represented by Mr   P.A.

Source officielle